Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Education
Related: About this forumWhy Elizabeth Warren should run for president
If it plays in Peoria...
York: Why Elizabeth Warren should run for president
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is on a publicity tour for her new campaign-style book, A Fighting Chance. As she talks to the press, Warren is repeating previous statements that she will not run for president in 2016. But her denials arent really denials, and her partys unique presidential circumstances give Warren plenty of room to run. Judging by what she has said publicly, theres no reason to rule out a Warren candidacy.
First, the non-denial denials. Recently ABCs David Muir asked Warren, Are you going to run for president? Warrens response was, Im not running for president.
Thats the oldest lawyerly evasion in the book. Warren, a former law professor, did not say, I am not going to run for president. Instead, she said she is not running, which could, in some sense, be true when she spoke the words but no longer true by, say, later this year.
...
The bottom line is that Warrens statements are entirely consistent with someone who is planning to announce a presidential candidacy later this year. Maybe she will, maybe she wont. But she ruled nothing out.
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is on a publicity tour for her new campaign-style book, A Fighting Chance. As she talks to the press, Warren is repeating previous statements that she will not run for president in 2016. But her denials arent really denials, and her partys unique presidential circumstances give Warren plenty of room to run. Judging by what she has said publicly, theres no reason to rule out a Warren candidacy.
First, the non-denial denials. Recently ABCs David Muir asked Warren, Are you going to run for president? Warrens response was, Im not running for president.
Thats the oldest lawyerly evasion in the book. Warren, a former law professor, did not say, I am not going to run for president. Instead, she said she is not running, which could, in some sense, be true when she spoke the words but no longer true by, say, later this year.
...
The bottom line is that Warrens statements are entirely consistent with someone who is planning to announce a presidential candidacy later this year. Maybe she will, maybe she wont. But she ruled nothing out.
Read more: http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140526/Opinion/140529468#ixzz32wArwwGk
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1838 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Elizabeth Warren should run for president (Original Post)
MannyGoldstein
May 2014
OP
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)1. I'm *completely* for it but why the ED Forum?
She's been rather quiet on ED issues. One fears it might be from a lack of understanding. ( a la Howard Dean)
Let's hear more from her about *schools*.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)2. Because I screwed up.
Meant to post in EW. Will move later, sorry!
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)3. Leave it here!
She gives nightmares to the same people that *authentic* ed reformers are *trying* to give nightmares to.
I'm just not sure on whether or not SHE'S sure they're the same people.