Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(20,733 posts)
Fri Nov 10, 2023, 07:43 PM Nov 2023

James Hansen, et al: How We Know that Global Warming is Accelerating and that the Goal of the Paris Agreement is Dead

How We Know that Global Warming is Accelerating and that the Goal of the Paris Agreement is Dead
10 November 2023
James Hansen, Pushker Kharecha, Norman Loeb, Makiko Sato, Leon Simons, George Tselioudis, and Karina von Schuckmann

The drive for global temperature change is Earth’s energy imbalance (EEI), the difference between the energy Earth receives from the Sun and energy Earth reflects and radiates back to space. We have good measurement of EEI today based on precise satellite data for change of reflected and emitted radiation calibrated by decadal ocean heat content change measured by deep-diving Argo floats. Interpretation of global temperature change and prediction of future temperature requires knowledge of the principal forcings that now affect EEI: human-made greenhouse gases (GHGs) and atmospheric aerosols (fine airborne particles). Aerosol climate forcing is not being measured, but information on aerosol forcing can be extracted from an ongoing “great inadvertent aerosol experiment” as a result of discrete changes in International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations on the sulfur content of ship fuels. These limited assessment tools are threatened by the absence of firm plans to continue direct EEI observations. A shortcoming of our climate science is failure to communicate well what is known from existing data. Global warming in the pipeline and emissions in the pipeline assure that the goal of the Paris Agreement – to keep global warming well below 2°C – is already dead, if policy is constrained only to emission reductions plus uncertain and unproven CO₂ removal methods.

Delayed response of climate makes human-made climate change a grave threat, especially for young people. Governments will not make required changes to energy policies based on theoretical threats – there must be sufficient empirical evidence of harm to force action. Thus, delayed response makes it difficult to avoid near-term, growing, climate impacts, but it does not prevent achievement of policies that will lead to a hospitable climate with a bright future for young people. Time is running short, however, and effective actions at this point require a good understanding of ongoing climate change and the responsible mechanisms.

The proximate cause of ongoing global warming is Earth’s energy imbalance (EEI). Earth is now absorbing more energy incoming from the Sun than the planet is sending back to space as reflected solar light and emitted thermal (heat) radiation. As long as that imbalance is positive – more energy coming in than going out – Earth will continue to get hotter. Factors that alter Earth’s energy balance are called climate forcings. There are two large human-made climate forcings: changes of atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs) and changes of aerosols. GHGs reduce heat radiation to space; thus, an increase of GHGs causes a positive energy imbalance, more energy coming in than going out, which causes warming. Aerosols reflect sunlight to space, which is a negative contribution to EEI that causes cooling.

Greenhouse Gases. GHGs are accurately measured and their total climate forcing can be calculated with an error less than or about 10%. GHG forcing increase since 1750 is about 4.1 W/m²; as shown in Fig. 1 of our Pipeline paper,¹ our calculation agrees well with that of the most recent IPCC report.² We can even calculate the annual change of the GHG climate forcing to high precision. In our graph of this annual change (Fig. 1), we show the five-year running mean because the large amount of “noise” in the annual mean tends to hide the trends that we wish to understand.³ The 2022 point in the graph is a 1-year mean and the 2021 point is a 3-year mean, so these are provisional and will change as later data are added.


Fig. 1. Annual growth of climate forcing by GHGs⁴ including the part of O₃ forcing not included in the CH₄ forcing.¹ MPTG and OTG are Montreal Protocol and Other Trace Gases.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
James Hansen, et al: How We Know that Global Warming is Accelerating and that the Goal of the Paris Agreement is Dead (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Nov 2023 OP
I hate that Mann has downplayed and cast doubt on Hansen's study NickB79 Nov 2023 #1
WBUR Commentary: Many scientists don't want to tell the truth about climate change. Here's why OKIsItJustMe Nov 2023 #2

NickB79

(19,621 posts)
1. I hate that Mann has downplayed and cast doubt on Hansen's study
Sat Nov 11, 2023, 09:12 AM
Nov 2023

I get that Mann is trying to fight defeatism/doomerism on the climate front, but Hansen's study seems pretty solid.

An argument between two giants of climate study only gives the deniers ammunition to use against us.

OKIsItJustMe

(20,733 posts)
2. WBUR Commentary: Many scientists don't want to tell the truth about climate change. Here's why
Sat Nov 11, 2023, 10:31 AM
Nov 2023
Many scientists don't want to tell the truth about climate change. Here's why


I've got two kids, and mornings are busy. And there are mornings when you are running behind and you leave the house knowing that your kid is probably going to be late for school.

Now, there is some potential that your car has been replaced by a faster, better car. There's some potential that you will hit no traffic on the way to school. But, these are things you've never seen happen before, so they're very unlikely, right?

But I still have to behave as if I can get my kid to school — within the limits of safety, of course. I can take the fastest route. I can try to be in the fastest lane on the highway. It's better for him to be 1 minute late, than to be 10 minutes late or an hour late.

And so the goal stays the same because you recognize that there is value in meeting that goal. And you still have to do your best to get there.




I hear Michael Mann (and others) say that (essentially) as soon as we stop emissions, the warming will stop, and I say, “That just doesn’t make sense! It’s not the act of emitting greenhouse gases that cause warming, it’s the accumulation.” I’m afraid while they are well meaning, they are playing into the hands of those who say that there is no need for urgent action.

I suppose, given the number and gravity of threats he has received since releasing the “hockey stick” that, perhaps he has other reasons to shade the truth.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»James Hansen, et al: How ...