Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(60,920 posts)
Fri Dec 22, 2023, 08:23 AM Dec 2023

Gas Utilities' Fight Against Climate Protection Just Beginning, As Colorado Towns Discovered

EDIT

In public hearings and private meetings, the Dallas-based company argued the city's plan would restrict consumer choice and further increase the community's high cost of living. The utility further claimed that the newest generation of heat pumps — an efficient source of electric heating and cooling — couldn't handle the harsh mountain climate's cold temperatures and high elevation. Researchers and installers say that's not true.

Ed. - emphasis added. Also, as if . . .

EDIT

Shortly before Crested Butte approved its gas ban, Gunnison proposed a more modest plan to encourage a gradual transition away from fossil fuels. Rather than banning gas hookups in new construction, the city floated a building code update with an option to require wiring and plugs so future residents could easily switch from gas to electric appliances. Atmos Energy quickly launched a multipronged campaign to defeat the policy. CPR News and NPR reviewed communications between Atmos and local officials, which were obtained through a public records request by the Energy and Policy Institute, and first reported by High Country News.

In September 2022, the company sent an email to local residents warning the plan would make housing less affordable, restrict energy choices and even increase climate-warming emissions. The email told residents that natural gas could help the community meet a "low-carbon future" and encouraged them to attend an upcoming town meeting and voice their opinions on the proposed rule.

Local leaders later found problems with the utility's claims. In a follow-up email to local government officials, John Cattles, a Gunnison County sustainability official, noted Atmos had overestimated the local cost of electricity by roughly 50%. He further found the company seemed to base its price estimates on traditional electric resistance heaters, which are far less energy-efficient than the electric heat pumps currently being installed.

EDIT

https://www.npr.org/2023/12/21/1220798642/how-a-utility-company-fought-to-keep-two-colorado-towns-hooked-on-fossil-fuels

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gas Utilities' Fight Against Climate Protection Just Beginning, As Colorado Towns Discovered (Original Post) hatrack Dec 2023 OP
The industry will... 2naSalit Dec 2023 #1
Yep, a bit of extra cable to the kitchen and a circuit breaker. hunter Dec 2023 #2

hunter

(38,922 posts)
2. Yep, a bit of extra cable to the kitchen and a circuit breaker.
Fri Dec 22, 2023, 11:22 AM
Dec 2023

Another for the water heater.

That's gonna make housing unaffordable.



The circuits installed for air conditioning will work just as well for heat pumps.

Residential gas distribution is a dangerous and obsolete nineteenth century technology. The twenty-first century will be better without it.

Retrofitting wiring for electric ranges in existing housing can be an expensive inconvenience. It's much less costly to install this wiring during construction.

Forcing people to use gas in new housing by omitting this wiring is not an ethical position.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Gas Utilities' Fight Agai...