Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,935 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 01:55 AM Mar 2024

California man is first in the US to be charged with smuggling greenhouse gases, prosecutors say

California man is first in the US to be charged with smuggling greenhouse gases, prosecutors say

A Southern California man was arrested on suspicion of smuggling refrigerants into the U.S. from Mexico

By The Associated Press
March 4, 2024, 10:19 PM ET • 2 min

SAN DIEGO -- A Southern California man was arrested Monday on suspicion of smuggling refrigerants into the U.S. from Mexico and federal prosecutors said he's the first person to be charged with violating regulations intended to curb the use of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

The indictment alleges Michael Hart, of San Diego, smuggled the ozone-depleting chemicals across the border concealed under a tarp and tools in his vehicle. He posted them for sale on the internet, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Hart was arraigned Monday afternoon and pleaded not guilty to 13 charges including conspiracy, sale of prohibited materials and illegal importation, the statement said.

It's the first prosecution in the U.S. to include charges related to a 2020 law that prohibits the importation of hydrofluorocarbons, commonly used as refrigerants, without permission from the Environmental Protection Agency, according to prosecutors.

{snip}
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California man is first in the US to be charged with smuggling greenhouse gases, prosecutors say (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 OP
There'll be a million bad RW wannabe-comedian bits about this and farts. RockRaven Mar 2024 #1
Article makes ignorant confusion between ozone depleting gases and greenhouse gases. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2024 #2
No, it does not. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #3
Okay, thanks for setting the attribution correctly. It is still an ignorant confusion. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2024 #4
It is possible the AP writer took some chemistry courses along the way and knows the distinction. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #5

RockRaven

(16,270 posts)
1. There'll be a million bad RW wannabe-comedian bits about this and farts.
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 01:59 AM
Mar 2024

Or there would be, if this were a bigger story.

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,935 posts)
3. No, it does not.
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 06:35 AM
Mar 2024

The Associated Press writer correctly uses the words "refrigerants" and "hydrofluorocarbons" throughout the article. It is only when the statement from the U.S. Attorney's office is quoted or otherwise referred to that the term "greenhouse gases" appears.

“This is the first time the Department of Justice is prosecuting someone for illegally importing greenhouse gases, and it will not be the last," U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath said in a statement. "We are using every means possible to protect our planet from the harm caused by toxic pollutants, including bringing criminal charges.”

And good morning.

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,935 posts)
5. It is possible the AP writer took some chemistry courses along the way and knows the distinction.
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 06:51 AM
Mar 2024

Last edited Tue Mar 5, 2024, 10:08 AM - Edit history (1)

The U.S. Attorney? Less so.

The AP can't make up quoted material, so the statement ran as delivered. The AP dislikes making corrections along the way.

From the June 2004, 39th edition of "The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law," which is the one I have next to me whenever I'm on the computer:

(sic) Do not use (sic) unless it is in the matter being quoted. To show that an error, peculiar usage or spelling is in the original, use a note to the editors at the top of the story, below the summary line but above the byline."

I would have used an Oxford comma there myself (error, peculiar usage, or spelling), but you know how that goes.

If you write the Associated Press, they might do that.

Thanks for writing.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»California man is first i...