Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(60,260 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2024, 10:15 AM Jul 17

Shocked, Shocked!! Jamie Dimon Backs Away From Climate Goals; Bank Made $430 Billion In FF Investments Since 2016

JPMorgan Chase, the world’s biggest investor in fossil fuels, may have misled investors and the public by backtracking on its already weak climate and environmental commitments, six US senators have warned in a letter to the CEO Jamie Dimon. Although a climate-disrupted world demands stronger action by the financial sector to reduce emissions and protect nature, the Wall Street firm is heading in the opposite direction, say the upper chamber legislators, who include Senate banking committee member Elizabeth Warren.

They have demanded clarification about the intentions of the world’s biggest bank. Senator Warren said: “If JPMorgan Chase has misled investors and the public, both Congress and regulators have a range of tools to respond as necessary.” They have given the bank until 24 July to reply. The letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, reflects growing concern that JPMorgan Chase is watering down public commitments it has made over decades. Campaigners say this poses a structural risk because short-term interests are taking precedence over long-term climate – and financial – stability.

JPMorgan Chase, which has $4tn in assets, has been criticised for making profits while the world burns. The letter notes that the company has financed over $430bn in fossil fuel projects since 2016, more than any other institution on the planet. Concerns rose earlier this year when Dimon announced a shift in policy that suggested JPMorgan Chase would dilute its environmental goals. In an 8 April letter to shareholders, he indicated the company was “going to use the word ‘commitment’ much more reservedly in the future, clearly differentiating between aspirations we are actively striving toward and binding commitments”.

EDIT

Concerns are also growing that other major US banks are sliding away from their promises of climate and biodiversity action. Citi, Bank of America and Wells Fargo also quit the Equator Principles earlier this year, a move that climate groups condemned as “shocking” and “cowardly”. At a time of record temperatures and deadly storms, this has led to a public backlash. On the streets, the climate finance movement has staged protests outside several Wall Street institutions, including Citi, Bank of America and major insurers. Pressure also came in the annual banking on climate chaos report, produced by a coalition of environmental groups, which details the investments of JPMorgan Chase and other majors bankers in climate destabilising projects. BlackRock also limited its involvement.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/jul/10/jpmorgan-jamie-dimon-climate-change-us-senator

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shocked, Shocked!! Jamie Dimon Backs Away From Climate Goals; Bank Made $430 Billion In FF Investments Since 2016 (Original Post) hatrack Jul 17 OP
Billionaires are mad with greed. First world citizens will not be inconvenienced. Magoo48 Jul 17 #1
I think Dimon is now another Billionaire for Trump ramapo Jul 17 #2

Magoo48

(4,953 posts)
1. Billionaires are mad with greed. First world citizens will not be inconvenienced.
Wed Jul 17, 2024, 10:25 AM
Jul 17

Climate Catastrophe will never receive more than a nod.

It is time to teach our next generations about all forms of adaptation.

ramapo

(4,701 posts)
2. I think Dimon is now another Billionaire for Trump
Wed Jul 17, 2024, 10:58 PM
Jul 17

He's looking for a tax cut. It seems that financial interests sense weakness among the Democrats which means another stint of climate-action delay while they all take profits.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Shocked, Shocked!! Jamie...