Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
AP: Protecting against floods, or a government-mandated retreat from the shore? New Jersey rules debated
https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-building-coastal-flooding-sandy-f8d7efea94f163aee5dd63f362d29522Protecting against floods, or a government-mandated retreat from the shore? New Jersey rules debated
BY WAYNE PARRY
Updated 5:30 PM EDT, August 1, 2024
TOMS RIVER, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey officials are defending proposed building rules designed to limit damage from future storms and steadily rising seas in coastal areas, countering criticism that the state aims to force people away from the Jersey Shore by making it harder and more expensive to build or rebuild there.
Lawmakers from both parties held a hearing Thursday in Toms River, one of the hardest-hit communities by Superstorm Sandy, to discuss the state’s Protecting Against Climate Threats initiative and respond to criticism of the proposal from business interests.
Mandated by an 2020 executive order from Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, the proposed rules are designed to account for rising seas and a changing climate in making land use decisions near the ocean, bays and rivers in an effort to limit damage from future storms.
The rules would extend the jurisdiction of flood control measures further inland, require buildings to be constructed five feet (1.5 meters) higher off the ground than current rules call for, and require elevating roadways in flood-prone areas.
…
People should be “free” to do whatever they want. First off, let’s repeal all zoning laws. Next, let’s repeal all speed limits. Oh, and seatbelt laws. Next, I demand that under the 2nd amendment, I have a right to own fully automatic weapons. …
BY WAYNE PARRY
Updated 5:30 PM EDT, August 1, 2024
TOMS RIVER, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey officials are defending proposed building rules designed to limit damage from future storms and steadily rising seas in coastal areas, countering criticism that the state aims to force people away from the Jersey Shore by making it harder and more expensive to build or rebuild there.
Lawmakers from both parties held a hearing Thursday in Toms River, one of the hardest-hit communities by Superstorm Sandy, to discuss the state’s Protecting Against Climate Threats initiative and respond to criticism of the proposal from business interests.
Mandated by an 2020 executive order from Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, the proposed rules are designed to account for rising seas and a changing climate in making land use decisions near the ocean, bays and rivers in an effort to limit damage from future storms.
The rules would extend the jurisdiction of flood control measures further inland, require buildings to be constructed five feet (1.5 meters) higher off the ground than current rules call for, and require elevating roadways in flood-prone areas.
…
You understand of course that when the next “Superstorm” hits, I will expect the emergency crews to rescue my family from the floodwaters, without consideration of their own lives.
(Obligatory
tag.)
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
What? Me Worry?
