Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSF Tech-Bros Want To Build "Eco-City" For 400,000 Residents In Solana County; They Have Water Rights To Support 40,000
In 2018, a company began quietly buying up some $900 million worth of land from farmers in Solano County, California, an area just north of the Bay Area. As the parcel ballooned to more than 60,000 acres, their motivations remained a mystery stoking unease and speculation. Then, last year, the news broke: The land was to become a brand-new eco-friendly city, backed by a roster of Silicon Valley billionaires, and built from the top-down by a company called California Forever.
The plan was launched by Jan Sramek, a former Goldman Sachs trader and California Forevers CEO. He said the project has three main goals: Help solve the California housing crisis; create a walkable metropolitan area with a high quality of life and low carbon footprint; and build a new economic engine for Solano County. Theres no playbook here, Sramek said. What we are trying to do is really, really different.
Before California Forever could break ground, their proposal, the East Solano Plan, needed approval from the people who already live in Solano County. Where Sramek envisioned growth, however, others warned of irreversible ecological damage. Despite launching a multimillion-dollar campaign to persuade the public to vote for the proposal in the upcoming November election, concerns continued to grow as elected officials began speaking out in opposition, and a coalition against the project formed. Local mistrust was further deepened by the companys ongoing lawsuit against landowners who resisted their offers. In April, a poll showed that 70 percent of Solanos voters would likely reject the measure.
EDIT
Instead of solving these problems with a new city, California Forevers critics would like to see more housing built in the seven cities that already exist in Solano County. Building housing in existing communities is one of our best climate solutions, and paving over 17,000 acres of non-irrigated farmland is not, said Sadie Wilson, director of planning and research at the Greenbelt Alliance. The nonprofit, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and the California Sierra Club, is one of the 16 groups in Solano Together, the coalition that opposes the project. Wilson says that the development threatens both the areas potential for storing carbon in the soil and local biodiversity, and also risks leading to more pollution from people driving to work in nearby cities. And although California Forever holds water rights that could support the first 40,000 residents, Solano Together says that these dont accurately reflect water availability. Securing a reliable supply, they argue, would be challenging in a region so prone to drought.
EDIT
https://grist.org/cities/california-sustainable-dream-city-from-scratch/
Cartoonist
(7,532 posts)I think they even called off the vote this time until they can come up with more lies and a better strategy to convince the voters.