Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(60,934 posts)
Sat Nov 9, 2024, 07:21 PM Nov 9

Testing Showed That 24/25 Honey Samples From UK Chains Were MIxed W. Sugar Syrup 5/5 Beekeeper Samples Authentic Honey

The honey industry faces new demands to overhaul its supply chain after more than 90% of sampled products bought from large British ­retailers failed pioneering authenticity tests. The UK branch of the Honey Authenticity Network sent 30 samples last month from Britain for a novel commercial test based on the DNA profiles of genuine honey. Five were from UK beekeepers and 25 from big retailers, including supermarkets.

The tests found that 24 out of the 25 jars of honey from retailers were considered suspicious. All five samples from UK beekeepers were considered to be genuine. Honey importers in the UK and some experts challenge the reliability of such testing, but this is the latest batch of tests suggesting what may be widespread adulteration in the honey supply chain, with some products suspected of being bulked out with cheaper sugar syrup.

EDIT

An EU investigation published last year found 46% of imported sampled products were suspected to be fraudulent, including all 10 honey samples from the UK. The EU is working on advanced testing techniques to detect honey fraud and has passed new legislation to provide improved labelling of country of origin on jars of honey.

Lynne Ingram, a Somerset beekeeper and the chair of the Honey Authenticity Network UK, said: “The market is being flooded by cheap, imported adulterated honey and it is undermining the business of genuine honey producers. The public are being misinformed, because they are buying what they think is genuine honey.” The UK is one of the biggest importers of cheap Chinese honey, which is known to be targeted by fraudsters. Honey importers say supply chains and provenance are carefully audited, but there has been no consensus on how technical tests should be applied, or which are most reliable.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/food/2024/nov/09/nine-in-ten-honey-samples-from-uk-retailers-fail-authenticity-test

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Testing Showed That 24/25 Honey Samples From UK Chains Were MIxed W. Sugar Syrup 5/5 Beekeeper Samples Authentic Honey (Original Post) hatrack Nov 9 OP
I suspect similar issues with maple syrup. snot Nov 9 #1
The usual term is "table syrup" OKIsItJustMe Nov 9 #2

snot

(10,704 posts)
1. I suspect similar issues with maple syrup.
Sat Nov 9, 2024, 08:20 PM
Nov 9

This isn't exactly the same situation, but last time I asked for maple syrup in a restaurant, the waitress was careful to call it something else – although it looked and tasted more or less like maple.

OKIsItJustMe

(20,760 posts)
2. The usual term is "table syrup"
Sat Nov 9, 2024, 08:41 PM
Nov 9

Sometimes it’s called “pancake syrup.”

I used to take middle schoolers camping in the woods. I found many of them had never tasted real maple syrup, and some actually preferred the “table syrup” their parents had raised them on. (New York State produces a lot of maple syrup, 2nd only to Vermont.)

Table syrup” (like “Log Cabin”) is significantly easier/cheaper to produce.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Testing Showed That 24/25...