Environment & Energy

NNadir

(35,273 posts) Wed Feb 5, 2025, 06:45 PM Feb 5

His Maggotcy King Musk Has Apparently Shut the Oldest Continuous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Site in the World.

The link, which I have accessed daily for many years is now dead. There is no information as to whether the lab itself has been shut and the scientists there have been fired.

Dead link:

Weekly average CO2 at Mauna Loa

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

His Maggotcy King Musk Has Apparently Shut the Oldest Continuous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Site in the World. (Original Post) NNadir Feb 5 OP

Apparently so Cirsium Feb 5 #1

Thanks for posting. It's stuff like this that get missed in the veritable "firehose" of bad news lately. I wouldn't.... EarnestPutz Feb 5 #2

Tried to get in. No go. WTF? cachukis Feb 5 #3

Saw an earlier post about it in GD. eppur_se_muova Feb 5 #4

The last time reporting from MLO went offline, it was because of lava . . hatrack Feb 5 #5

It's back ramapo Feb 5 #6

no global warming if there is no evidence. pansypoo53219 Feb 6 #7

It seems to be back up, for how long it will be, is hard to tell. I've read that project 2025 calls for removing NOAA. NNadir Feb 6 #8

Carbon Dioxide wouldn't pledge personal loyalty to Shitstain, so the site's on thin ice . . . hatrack Feb 6 #9

The planet's on thin ice. Back in 2016, the data was shocking... NNadir Feb 6 #10

Cirsium

(1,914 posts)

1. Apparently so

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 06:54 PM

Feb 5

Thanks for the alert.

EarnestPutz

(2,795 posts)

2. Thanks for posting. It's stuff like this that get missed in the veritable "firehose" of bad news lately. I wouldn't....

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 06:56 PM

Feb 5

....be surprised if the everyone was fired, the lab was shut and then it was burned to the ground.

cachukis

(2,923 posts)

3. Tried to get in. No go. WTF?

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 07:35 PM

Feb 5

eppur_se_muova

(38,510 posts)

4. Saw an earlier post about it in GD.

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 07:37 PM

Feb 5

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219991723

No inconvenient truths permitted under this dictatorship.

hatrack

(61,943 posts)

5. The last time reporting from MLO went offline, it was because of lava . .

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 08:39 PM

Feb 5

This time, the obstacle's sulfuric stench is far more pronounced.

ramapo

(4,756 posts)

6. It's back

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Wed Feb 5, 2025, 11:56 PM

Feb 5

Hopefully to stay: 2255 2/5/25

pansypoo53219

(22,015 posts)

7. no global warming if there is no evidence.

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 06:54 AM

Feb 6

ostriches in charge.

NNadir

(35,273 posts)

8. It seems to be back up, for how long it will be, is hard to tell. I've read that project 2025 calls for removing NOAA.

Reply to pansypoo53219 (Reply #7)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 06:59 AM

Feb 6

hatrack

(61,943 posts)

9. Carbon Dioxide wouldn't pledge personal loyalty to Shitstain, so the site's on thin ice . . .

Reply to NNadir (Reply #8)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 08:50 AM

Feb 6

A happy thought as we await the January totals . . . .

https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/monthly.html

NNadir

(35,273 posts)

10. The planet's on thin ice. Back in 2016, the data was shocking...

Reply to hatrack (Reply #9)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 09:56 AM

Feb 6

...until 2024 blew 2016 away.

Of course, in 2015, 1998 was shocking.

In 1997, 1988 was shocking, at least to anyone who was looking. (I wasn't, my attention was drawn to it by Al Gore.)

There's noise of course, things like Covid and economic down turns, but the trend is clearly quadratic (parabolic) when one smoothes the data. (I suspect it may even be cubic with, thankfully, a low coefficient for the first term.)

I still, perhaps naively, believe it is technically feasible to do something, but obviously not politically. It is startling for me as the end of my life approaches to see a dark age of ignorance transcendent rising.

Reply to this discussion