Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,295 posts)
Tue Nov 9, 2021, 07:42 PM Nov 2021

Infrastructure package puts $66 billion into rail. Could power biggest expansion in Amtrak history.

Transportation

The infrastructure package puts $66 billion into rail. It could power the biggest expansion in Amtrak’s 50-year history.

The funding would help rebuild the Northeast Corridor, but is also a path to bringing service to new cities and towns nationwide

By Luz Lazo
Yesterday at 7:13 p.m. EST

The $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill that passed the House on Friday is expected to spur the largest expansion in Amtrak’s history while kick-starting repair and replacement projects across the nation’s passenger rail network.

The bill includes $66 billion in new funding for rail to address Amtrak’s repair backlog, improve stations, replace old trains and create a path to modernize the Washington-to-Boston corridor, the nation’s busiest. It would be the biggest boost of federal aid to Amtrak since Congress created it half a century ago.

“It’s transformative,” Amtrak chief executive William J. Flynn said in an interview Monday. Money set aside for Amtrak, he said, “represents more funds than have been cumulatively invested in Amtrak over the first 50 years of our history.”

The funding will help to rebuild the aging infrastructure of the Northeast Corridor, which includes several bridges and tunnels more than 100 years old. But it could also help bring passenger service to new cities and towns across the nation. The changes would mark an overhaul for a service map that has remained nearly unchanged during a period when the nation gained 120 million people.

{snip}

By Luz Lazo
Luz Lazo is a transportation reporter at The Washington Post covering passenger and freight transportation, buses, taxis and ride-sharing services. She also writes about traffic, road infrastructure and air travel in the Washington region and beyond. She joined The Post in 2011. Twitter https://twitter.com/luzcita
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Infrastructure package puts $66 billion into rail. Could power biggest expansion in Amtrak history. (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 OP
Im guessing but I think this is good thing even from a hard core Progressive standpoint. honest.abe Nov 2021 #1
Alas, the trains we probably won't see return Vogon_Glory Nov 2021 #2
 

honest.abe

(9,238 posts)
1. Im guessing but I think this is good thing even from a hard core Progressive standpoint.
Tue Nov 9, 2021, 08:23 PM
Nov 2021

Public trans, cut down on car travel, reduced carbon, good for the future.. correct?

Vogon_Glory

(9,590 posts)
2. Alas, the trains we probably won't see return
Tue Nov 9, 2021, 08:33 PM
Nov 2021

I’m afraid that there are a lot of passenger routes that I wish would come back, even if some of them were discontinued before Amtrak started operation.

Some of them are: the Twin Star Rocket (Houston to Minneapolis/St. Paul), the Texas Zephyr (although a route through Abilene and Lubbock would be a nice substitute), and perhaps the North Coast Limited (BNSF’s ex Northern Pacific main). Alas, these routes would run through red states with GQP senators, congress-critters, and state legislators.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»Infrastructure package pu...