Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,918 posts)
Thu May 18, 2023, 02:57 PM May 2023

California's high-speed rail is running out of money, but progress has been made

TECH

California’s high-speed rail is running out of money, but progress has been made

PUBLISHED WED, MAY 17 2023 • 8:13 AM EDT • UPDATED WED, MAY 17 2023 • 8:58 AM EDT

Jeniece Pettitt
@JENIECEP

KEY POINTS
• California’s plan is to build an electric train that will connect Los Angeles with the Central Valley and then San Francisco in two hours and 40 minutes.
• But 15 years later, there is not a single mile of track laid, and executives involved say there isn’t enough money to finish the project.
• Estimates suggest it will cost between $88 billion and $128 billion to complete the entire system from LA to San Francisco.

In 2008, California voted yes on a $9 billion bond authorization to build the nation’s first high-speed railway. The plan is to construct an electric train that will connect Los Angeles with the Central Valley and then San Francisco in two hours and 40 minutes.

But 15 years later, there is not a single mile of track laid, and executives involved say there isn’t enough money to finish the project. The latest estimates from the California High-Speed Rail Authority suggest it will cost between $88 billion and $128 billion to complete the entire system from LA to San Francisco. Inflation and higher construction costs have contributed to the high price tag.

The project has spent $9.8 billion so far, according to Brian Kelly, CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. ... “We knew we’ve had a funding gap ever since the project started,” Kelly said. “What I know is this: The earlier we build it, the cheaper it will be.”

But at this point, it’s not clear where the funding is going to come from. So far, 85% of it has come from the state of California. ... “One of the biggest hurdles clearly is funding,” said Toks Omishakin, secretary of the California State Transportation Agency. “We can’t get this project done without federal support. It’s just not going to happen.“

{snip}
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California's high-speed rail is running out of money, but progress has been made (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2023 OP
lets do some math lapfog_1 May 2023 #1
Because we should only fund projects that generate profit? ColinC May 2023 #2
infrastructure is fine lapfog_1 May 2023 #3
It's infrastructure ColinC May 2023 #5
Where did the $9.8 billion go ? MichMan May 2023 #4

lapfog_1

(30,143 posts)
1. lets do some math
Thu May 18, 2023, 03:23 PM
May 2023

lets say 250 people ride the train from LA to SF every day... and there are 10 trains a day... and it operates 365 days a year... and each ticket costs $500...

how long to generate revenue of $88 Billion.

250 x 10 x 365 x 500 = 465,250,000 per year

88 billion / 465,250,000 = 189 years of operation... not including ongoing costs of people, energy, maintenance.

Probably should cancel this project.

ColinC

(10,667 posts)
2. Because we should only fund projects that generate profit?
Thu May 18, 2023, 05:01 PM
May 2023

And infrastructure is not worth while if it is not profitable? That is literally most publicly funded projects.

lapfog_1

(30,143 posts)
3. infrastructure is fine
Thu May 18, 2023, 05:15 PM
May 2023

this is a boondoggle... a very expensive boondoggle.

You want to get from LA to San Fran (or vice versa), there are already airplanes that do it.

Not to mention the environmental impact of the high speed railroad track and all of the bridges that must be built because you can't have a standard crossing with high speed rail.

There are literally dozens of other infrastructure projects that could be built that would improve more lives...

ColinC

(10,667 posts)
5. It's infrastructure
Thu May 18, 2023, 07:18 PM
May 2023

Being built on about a hundred years of outdated and unusable infrastructure and poor city planning, requiring billions of dollars to put in place a modern system. We can keep living in the past with ancient technology, or put in the hard work and substantial investment that would save us trillions in the long term and catch us up with the rest of the modern industrialized world. I prefer the latter.

MichMan

(13,156 posts)
4. Where did the $9.8 billion go ?
Thu May 18, 2023, 06:08 PM
May 2023
But 15 years later, there is not a single mile of track laid, and executives involved say there isn’t enough money to finish the project. The latest estimates from the California High-Speed Rail Authority suggest it will cost between $88 billion and $128 billion to complete the entire system from LA to San Francisco. Inflation and higher construction costs have contributed to the high price tag.

The project has spent $9.8 billion so far, according to Brian Kelly, CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. ... “We knew we’ve had a funding gap ever since the project started,”
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»California's high-speed r...