Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 07:28 PM Nov 2014

Mother Jones re: the Just Mayo lawsuit

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/11/great-mayo-smackdown?google_editors_picks=true

-snip-
Last Friday, the Anglo-Dutch mega-conglomerate Unilever, owner of Hellmann's Mayonnaise, filed suit against the vegan upstart Hampton Creek, maker of egg-free Just Mayo, citing "false advertising and unfair competition," and whining claiming that "Just Mayo already is stealing market share from Hellmann's."

Unilever, which long ago swallowed Ben & Jerry's, Breyer's, Lipton, Mrs. Filbert's, Slimfast, Close-Up, Noxzema, Q-Tips, Vaseline, and hundreds of other brands into its multinational maw, argues that "Hampton Creek's materially false and misleading Just Mayo name, packaging, and advertising has caused and unless restrained will continue to cause great and irreparable injury to Unilever." That irreparable injury—for which Unilever requests that Hampton Creek change the name, remove all jars from shelves, and pay Unilever three times damages, plus attorney's fees—comes because Hampton Creek is trying to pass off its eggless goop as mayonnaise, which "damages the entire product category, which has strived for decades for a consistent definition of ‘mayonnaise' that fits with consumer expectations." The FDA, Unilever correctly points out, defines mayonnaise as including an "egg-yolk containing ingredient." Hampton Creek has fired back that, duh, that's why they call their product mayo, not mayonnaise.
-snip-
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mother Jones re: the Just Mayo lawsuit (Original Post) LiberalElite Nov 2014 OP
Perhaps Hampton Creek should also use the etymology of the word kentauros Nov 2014 #1
"Stealing market share" ??? silverweb Nov 2014 #2
yeah heh - LiberalElite Nov 2014 #3
I've had it. silverweb Nov 2014 #4
They should have named it "Genuine Vegan Artificial Mayonnaise Type Substance." longship Nov 2014 #5
I vote for, "Better Than Mayo" ginnyinWI Nov 2014 #6
That would be okay with me. longship Nov 2014 #7
Technically, according to the FDA, there is no such food stuff called "mayo". Luminous Animal Nov 2014 #8

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
1. Perhaps Hampton Creek should also use the etymology of the word
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 07:53 PM
Nov 2014

in their defense, as it appears the original word may have been "mahonnaise." Hellmann's may have been misspelling it all along!

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
2. "Stealing market share" ???
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:13 PM
Nov 2014

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I thought the "free market" was based on competition and enterprise? The "invisible hand" is supposed to sort out which product is best by virtue of its popularity with users (sales).

How can a new, better product be "stealing" market share by virtue of being more popular? Isn't that what the "market" is supposed to be all about?

I think Unilever is going to lose this suit big time, and I hope they have to pay Hampton Creek's legal fees plus damages.

Best Foods/Hellman's is what I grew up with and it used to be my gold standard for mayonnaise. Then I started making my own (which is pretty good, if I do say so myself).

Now I'll be buying Just Mayo. Oh, and I'll be boycotting all other Unilever products, too!

This is for you, Unilever:

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
4. I've had it.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:19 PM
Nov 2014

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]It really is quite good and better than the other vegan options out there.

Love the free advertising from the monolith!

longship

(40,416 posts)
5. They should have named it "Genuine Vegan Artificial Mayonnaise Type Substance."
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:35 PM
Nov 2014

By naming it "Just Mayo" and simultaneously claiming to be vegan, they are clearly exercising in deception.

There is no such thing as vegan mayonnaise, since mayo is made from eggs, which vegans do not eat. So "Just Mayo" is an outright lie.

The marketers of "Just Mayo" deserve to lose, mainly because they should have called their product, "Just No Mayo". Or maybe, "Genuine Vegan Artificial Mayonnaise Type Substance"

You can tell I might not be the best marketer. But I hope they lose, if only for the deception.

I have no problem with vegans. Just sleazy marketing.

longship

(40,416 posts)
7. That would be okay with me.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 03:46 PM
Nov 2014

Myself, I like mayo and always have a big jar of it in the fridge.

Regards.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
8. Technically, according to the FDA, there is no such food stuff called "mayo".
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 10:42 PM
Nov 2014

It entered the common vernacular as slang. Which is why, even though Kraft uses it on their mayonnaise, they are unable to trademark the word. And though the vast majority of us may understand mayo to mean mayonnaise, the Feds don't and the word has been up for grabs for a long time. I think it was a brilliant move and legally, they had every right to use it. What they can't use is "mayonnaise" and they don't.

Kudos for Unilever for giving the product a big giant boost in sales.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights»Mother Jones re: the Just...