Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,474 posts)
Mon Sep 23, 2019, 12:16 PM Sep 2019

Lawsuit over politically 'slanted' Trump wildlife board can proceed: U.S. judge

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge has rejected the Trump administration’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit by animal rights groups seeking to dissolve a wildlife advisory board they said was stacked with politically connected donors and pro-hunting enthusiasts.

U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan said on Monday that the administration has not shown that its International Wildlife Conservation Council served the public interest, having justified it with “boilerplate” language rather than the required “reasoned explanation.”

She said the plaintiffs could try to prove that the 17-person board was not “fairly balanced” to incorporate different points of view, reflecting what they called its lack of scientists, economists and wildlife conservation experts.

A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman in Manhattan, whose office defended the government, declined to comment.

The lawsuit was filed in August 2018 by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Humane Society.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wildlife-lawsuit/lawsuit-over-politically-slanted-trump-wildlife-board-can-proceed-u-s-judge-idUSKBN1W81RC?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights»Lawsuit over politically ...