Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(125,474 posts)
Wed Jan 7, 2026, 01:43 AM Yesterday

Foreign-Imposed Regime Changes Rarely Work. Why Do Countries Keep Trying? - William Spaniel



The United States is attempting something known as "foreign-imposed regime change." Historically, there are few cases where the strategy went well. Yet countries keep trying it. Why? Today's video looks at a fundamental inference problem. The ability to impose regime change generates bargaining leverage. Leaders under duress try to offer concessions commensurate with their rivals' ability to execute the strategy so as to avoid the bad outcome. As a result, capacity is uncorrelated with actually trying it. Combine that with how most countries are bad at imposing regime change, and you get an abundance of observed cases where it goes poorly and few where it goes well.

0:00 A Brief History of Foreign Imposed Regime Change
2:52 Summary of the Paradox's Cause
3:50 Why Bargaining Usually Wins
6:38 Bargaining and Observable Outcomes
9:20 How Bargaining Problems Cause Regime Change
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Foreign-Imposed Regime Ch...