Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

6chars

(3,967 posts)
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:32 AM Apr 2016

US University Debating Championship motion on IP conflict

"Dear experts: It’s not the debate that’s the problem. It’s the framing. From Tablet, an online magazine:

Last October 3, a two-year old infant was stabbed in Jerusalem by a Palestinian terrorist, who murdered the baby’s father and critically wounded his mother. On January 15, a mother-of-six was stabbed to death at home in front of her teenage daughter by another terrorist. Last Sunday, April 10, participants at the U.S. Universities Debating Championship (USUDC) at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia, were challenged to justify attacks of this nature with the motion, “This House Believes That Violence By Palestinians Against Israeli Civilian Targets Is Justified.”

According to Jordan Trafton, a student from Claremont McKenna College, who judged at the tournament, the motion failed to arouse controversy when announced. “I look around and nobody is doing anything, and I’m so shocked,” he said. “This is Morehouse, a historically black college where everyone is up in arms about social justice.”

http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2016/04/14/participants-in-atlanta-debate-championship-required-to-justify-palestinian-violence-against-israeli-civilians/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»US University Debating Ch...