Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumMcGill U Professor Calls Student Judicial Ban on BDS ‘Huge;’ Says It Recognizes ‘Jewish Concerns
BDS finally banned on campus due to being recognized as a hate movement.
WhoDaThunkIt?
Here's hoping a shitload of other universities follow suit!
McGill U Professor Calls Student Judicial Ban on BDS Huge; Says It Recognizes Jewish Concerns Deserve Respect Like All Others
A history professor and anti-BDS warrior at McGill University in Canada responded enthusiastically to a landmark decision taken on Wednesday by the legal arm of the institutions student body to ban anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions activities on campus.
Gil Troy, among 150 academics at McGill who recently signed an open letter lauding the principal of the university for condemning BDS and calling on faculty everywhere to do the same, told The Algemeiner on Thursday that in his view, This decision is huge! It means that Jewish concerns are respected with all others, and that antisemitism is also recognized as bigotry, as well as something that triggers macro-aggressions.
Troy, author of Why I Am A Zionist and a Shalom Hartman Research Fellow in Jerusalem, where he lives, was responding to the Reference re Legality of the BDS Motion and Similar Motions a long, detailed legal document issued by the Students Society of McGill University (SSMU) Judicial Board, which reached what it called a unanimous decision to eliminate efforts to promote anti-Israel boycotts at the Montreal-based school, asserting that such activities are discriminatory, unconstitutional and in violation of SSMUs equity policy.
The decision came in the wake of three BDS motions over the past year and a half, which were put to a student vote at McGill and defeated.
The fight spilled over into some antisemitic expressions on campus, Troy said. And while normally, from an ideological standpoint, I would prefer to see such battles fought out democratically, the BDS forces have continually ignored, disrespected and undermined the democratic process repeatedly raising the issue despite losing. Mere days ago, they even used some sneaky, sleazy procedure to bypass the student ratification vote.
Troy, who has been a leading member of the Vote No campaign to persuade professors at all Canadian universities to band together to combat the phenomenon, concluded: I hope this wise decision will allow McGill to return to the civility and reason that has been the general tone on campus for most of my 20-plus years with this world-class institution.
A history professor and anti-BDS warrior at McGill University in Canada responded enthusiastically to a landmark decision taken on Wednesday by the legal arm of the institutions student body to ban anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions activities on campus.
Gil Troy, among 150 academics at McGill who recently signed an open letter lauding the principal of the university for condemning BDS and calling on faculty everywhere to do the same, told The Algemeiner on Thursday that in his view, This decision is huge! It means that Jewish concerns are respected with all others, and that antisemitism is also recognized as bigotry, as well as something that triggers macro-aggressions.
Troy, author of Why I Am A Zionist and a Shalom Hartman Research Fellow in Jerusalem, where he lives, was responding to the Reference re Legality of the BDS Motion and Similar Motions a long, detailed legal document issued by the Students Society of McGill University (SSMU) Judicial Board, which reached what it called a unanimous decision to eliminate efforts to promote anti-Israel boycotts at the Montreal-based school, asserting that such activities are discriminatory, unconstitutional and in violation of SSMUs equity policy.
The decision came in the wake of three BDS motions over the past year and a half, which were put to a student vote at McGill and defeated.
The fight spilled over into some antisemitic expressions on campus, Troy said. And while normally, from an ideological standpoint, I would prefer to see such battles fought out democratically, the BDS forces have continually ignored, disrespected and undermined the democratic process repeatedly raising the issue despite losing. Mere days ago, they even used some sneaky, sleazy procedure to bypass the student ratification vote.
Troy, who has been a leading member of the Vote No campaign to persuade professors at all Canadian universities to band together to combat the phenomenon, concluded: I hope this wise decision will allow McGill to return to the civility and reason that has been the general tone on campus for most of my 20-plus years with this world-class institution.
more...
http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/06/02/mcgill-u-professor-calls-student-judicial-ban-on-bds-huge-says-it-recognizes-jewish-concerns-deserve-respect-like-all-others/#
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1602 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McGill U Professor Calls Student Judicial Ban on BDS ‘Huge;’ Says It Recognizes ‘Jewish Concerns (Original Post)
shira
Jun 2016
OP
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)1. Part of the legalese in the SSMU Judicial Board document argues that all boycotts of the settlements
are boycotts of Israel by proxy, which instinctively seems a bit wrong to me (see points 25-29). (http://www.pdf.investintech.com/preview/0abcabb4-285a-11e6-837c-002590d31986/index.html)
I think that boycotting the settlements shouldn't be conflated with boycotting Israel. Unfortunately, every attempt to combat BDS always includes an attempt to make the settlements part of Israel. My conclusion is therefore that all attempts to combat BDS are motivated by support for the settlements.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)2. BDS has nothing to do with settlements
You might want to go to the website:
https://bdsmovement.net