Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Israeli Right still hasn't internalized that Palestinians exist
Arabs are more present than ever in the Israeli public sphere, but attempts to marginalize them are growing at an even faster pace. A new law aimed at pushing Arab representatives out of the political system could wind up changing the rules of the game — in the worst possible way.By Noam Sheizaf
Published July 21, 2016
The Knesset this week passed a law that will enable it to expel Arab MKs from their positions as elected representatives. The same day, a storm erupted over a program on Army Radio that examined a poem by Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish. Both events have one thing in common: they highlight Israeli right wing’s hopeless desire to make the country’s pesky Palestinian population simply disappear. That’s no easy task considering that proportionally speaking, there are more Arab citizens in Israel than African Americans or Hispanic Americans in the United States. And can anybody even imagine a U.S. without them?
Those on the right in Israel will tell you that they don’t oppose the Arabs themselves, just their ideas. That is, of course, feigned naïveté. As long as Israel is defined as a Jewish state, Arabs will always feel alienated from it. An Arab can become Israeli like he or she can become German or American, but he cannot become Jewish, which Israeli Jews wouldn’t want either. That’s the fundamental difference between the Israeli model and the Western democratic model, where even if there sometimes exist symbols of Christianity or some other nation, Western democracies are ultimately based on the idea of “a state of all its citizens.” In Israel, that idea is so terrifying to people that some want to criminalize even advocating for it.
And yet despite this unusual model, Israel has managed to maintain a mostly democratic system within its pre-1967 borders (though never a liberal one). It worked, somehow, because of the pragmatic attitude adopted by both the Jewish majority and the Palestinian minority that survived 1948. For example, the unwritten compromise according to which Palestinians can vote and be elected, even if they oppose — quite naturally — the very idea of a Jewish state. Or that a Palestinian poet can be canonized even if, among other things, he wrote poems that portray Jews as the enemy, just as Israeli poets who saw Arabs as enemies enjoy an even more sacred stature.
What made it work was the separation that existed between the realm of culture and narrative, in which each nation holds on to their self-defined image of the world – sometimes to the extreme — and the tangible realm of actions, in which we all live together with various compromises and sometimes just by looking the other way. For the new Israeli Right, however, that isn’t enough. For them, the Jewish state needs to be completely Jewish in its culture, Jewish in its allocation of resources, Jewish in its political discourse, and so on. To be fair, that’s the spirit of the moment everywhere — we are living in an era that loves absolute justice, especially in the cultural sphere, and which scorns compromise. Among other reasons, that can also explain the rise of the nationalist Right across the globe.
Continue reading @
http://972mag.com/the-israeli-rights-palestinian-delusion/120791/
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
Do you think that other democratic countries should adopt similar laws?
We just discussed this a couple days ago. You mistakenly claimed that there were no democracies with similar laws (except maybe Russia or Iran
) and then had pointed out three obvious ones (the US, UK, and Canada)
You tried desperately to spin that they were entirely different because in this case the purpose of the rule is different (it isn't, but it wouldn't matter in the least if it was)... but did you expect anyone to buy that? If a state wants to set their speed limit at 65 mph and you claim that nobody has a speed limit that low... will you be able to spin away the error because all of the states with similar or lower speed limits set them for safety reasons and this state is doing it to reduce carbon emissions?
Of course that would be nonsensical. All three major democracies that we discussed have "similar laws" (i.e., Constitution, rules of the legislature, etc.) that have much lower thresholds.
I personally don't see how removing Arab MKs or threatening to remove them if they continue to represent their voters will make Israel more democratic...
It doesn't have anything to do with making them more democratic or less. It allows them to keep criminals and traitors from holding on to seats in their national legislature. Kicking Bob Packwood out was not a decision to make the US more/less democratic.
We just discussed this a couple days ago. You mistakenly claimed that there were no democracies with similar laws (except maybe Russia or Iran
) and then had pointed out three obvious ones (the US, UK, and Canada)
You tried desperately to spin that they were entirely different because in this case the purpose of the rule is different (it isn't, but it wouldn't matter in the least if it was)... but did you expect anyone to buy that? If a state wants to set their speed limit at 65 mph and you claim that nobody has a speed limit that low... will you be able to spin away the error because all of the states with similar or lower speed limits set them for safety reasons and this state is doing it to reduce carbon emissions?
Of course that would be nonsensical. All three major democracies that we discussed have "similar laws" (i.e., Constitution, rules of the legislature, etc.) that have much lower thresholds.
I personally don't see how removing Arab MKs or threatening to remove them if they continue to represent their voters will make Israel more democratic...
It doesn't have anything to do with making them more democratic or less. It allows them to keep criminals and traitors from holding on to seats in their national legislature. Kicking Bob Packwood out was not a decision to make the US more/less democratic.
...........wow progress !!
You managed to read an article without calling Shlomi Eldar ( a Leftist journalist ) and Al Monitor
nonsense and liars .......congratulations 