Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
2. So you agree that advocating Israel's destruction is antisemitic?
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 05:22 AM
Sep 2016

Last edited Wed Sep 14, 2016, 06:07 AM - Edit history (1)

"Saying that Israel should cease to exist, or should not have come into being, this is crossing the line."


Bingo.

Proving conclusively BDS is antisemitic.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
3. Calling for the destruction of Israel is almost always anti-Semitic.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 06:23 AM
Sep 2016

There are probably exceptions, but I can't think of any right now. But arguing that BDS is calling for the destruction of Israel is a real stretch.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
4. And that's exactly what Phil Weiss & Omar Barghouti do....
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 06:46 AM
Sep 2016

It's what anyone who advocates full right-of-return is doing. They're calling for Israel's destruction.

Mahmoud Abbas knows this.


Abbas Deemed It 'Illogical' for Israel to Absorb 5 Million Refugees, Palestine Papers Show
"On numbers of refugees, it is illogical to ask Israel to take 5 million, or indeed 1 million," Abbas said, according to the details of the Palestine papers. "That would mean the end of Israel."

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/abbas-deemed-it-illogical-for-israel-to-absorb-5-million-refugees-palestine-papers-show-1.338981


The founder of BDS, Omar Barghouti knows this.

“I do not buy into the two state solution. It is not just pragmatically impossible, it was never a moral solution. The first issue would be the right of return, but if the refugees were to return you cannot have a two state solution like one Palestinian commentator remarked. You will have a Palestinian State next to a Palestinian State, rather than a Palestinian State next to Israel.

Omar Barghouti, Ottawa University, March 4, 2009
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
5. Abbas and Barghouti of BDS admit it. Allowing full RoR means the end of Israel...
Thu Sep 15, 2016, 04:17 PM
Sep 2016

They can put lipstick on it and call it equal rights with Jews to live in Israel (even though Palestinians could live in Gaza/WB) but they admit it would destroy Israel.

Why can't you?

Be honest.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
6. It seems as if we have different definitions of what constitutes calling for the destruction of
Thu Sep 15, 2016, 08:28 PM
Sep 2016

Israel.

I'll go with Oz on this one.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Amos Oz: Denying Israel's...