....on US Embassies as well as tearing up Oslo.

And for what? Putting a US Embassy in West Jerusalem which would never become part of Palestine?

You support that bullshit?

He's lost all perspective, we are talking about a single building in West J'lem,

How does moving the embassy end the peace process anyway? Seems like Erekat just admitted that they have been bullshitting from the beginning, dividing J'lem has been the idea from before Oslo.

You expect Bibi to get caught being to the left of the US President, with his coalition partners demanding explicit apartheid?

That is politically impossible to maintain--
Trump administration is refusing to even meet with the Palestinians--whom they do not view as human beings.

Your opinion that Erekat should quit doesn't go far enough. The Palestinian Authority should be dissolved and Oslo declared null and void. Suspend all security cooperation between Israel and the Palestinians, and force the IDF to provide security, with the Israeli taxpayers on the hook for providing for the needs of the occupied people.

On January 20th, the one-state solution process begins. And that beginning involves recognizing there's nothing to talk about.

Time for rightwing Israelis and their enablers in the USA to learn that their actions too have a price tag.

the Trump administration has already signaled that liberals in the USA will have to choose between adopting a rightwing ideology or being supportive of Israel.

moving the embassy to the western part of Jerusalem. Where the seat of Israeli government is at? Is is also well within the 'green line' of the 1949 armistice lines, which means even if Israel were to pull out of the entire West Bank, it still would be part of Israel.

not in a vacuum?

It is frightening that an ostensible progressive person believes those to be the only options.

Thinking the only alternative to it is genocide is ridiculous.

Certainly more plausible than Trump and his merry duo of Kahanists Greenblatt and Friedman preserving the possibility of the two-state solution.

Certainly no one would hold that country up as any kind of a model.

A multi-national state is not going to happen. The parties themselves do not want it; they seek separation in the form of two independent states. Also, the international community overwhelmingly rejects the one state option and supports two states based on negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians, as the recent UNSC resolution demonstrates.

The settlements project is designed to prevent separation.

I suspect we'll see the same arc as SA, first apartheid and then a multiethnic state.


That scenario certainly carries some risks for the Israelis, but that's their problem, a problem they chose for themselves.

In a way, Trump is a dash of reality. The USA is not going to save Israel for itself. We are its enabler, not its friend.

Multi-racial, yes, but multi-national? And as has already been stated, they have their problems.