What would be the blowback?

to make it impossible for Israel to remain a democratic and Jewish state.

Those that support Israel remaining a democratic and Jewish state oppose the settlements. Those who fail to oppose the settlements have a different agenda.

But believe that Jerusalem is a more complicated situation.

The Obama administration agrees with that which is one of the reasons why they would not vote for it.

All the Jewish holy sites - which are located in E Jerusalem, from which Jews were expelled by Jordan during the Jordanian occupation of the city.

built on private Palestinian land?

Here are the first three operative clauses:

“1. Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace;

“2. Reiterates its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and that it fully respect all of its legal obligations in this regard;

“3. Underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations;

of East Jerusalem and other occupied territories.

The Israelis say everything must be resolved via negotiations while creating "facts on the ground" that make negotiations moot.

Seems their leaders are the ones who need to be pressured.

It has been central to Jewish life and thought for literally centuries. In particular the Old City and the Jewish Quarter which contains almost all of the holiest sites in Judaism.

In 1947-48, Jordanian forces conquered the eastern portion of the city and expelled all of the Jewish residents. They then took to plundering formerly Jewish homes and synagogues and did not allow Jews to set foot in the Old City during their nearly twenty year occupation.

I think that message should be spread far and wide across the Middle East and beyond.

Another is that Russia voted for this, while continuing with its own settlements in Georgia & Crimea. For some reason, that's not illegal. Only when Jews do it in their ancient homeland, their ancient capital. Go figure.

Last takeaway is that the PA/Hamas will see Jews in Jerusalem as a greenlight to continue inciting, praising, and rewarding terror attacks on Jews, while continuing to be funded by western governments. Yet another proud moment for humanity.

Question:
Are we to take from this that Jews praying at the Wall is now illegal?

1) A UN envoy has taken the lead for several years in trying to get peace talks and to coordinate whatever aid they can get into Syria. They have been unsuccessful, but not silent.

2) I seem to remember many UN meetings dealing with Syria - in 2 recent ones, Samantha Powers and John Kerry respectively were not silent at all.

3) It IS true that there were no recent resolutions. The reason is pretty obvious - Russia has a veto. (This would be like saying that until this week, the UN was silent on Israel for the 8 year Obama term. We vetoed every other resolution. The last Syrian resolution was a very hard fought one initiated by John Kerry and worked on by many countries including Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran. That resolution was the basis for much that the UN tried to do.

The US and EU DOES call the settlements in Crimea etc illegal -- that is why fairly onerous sanctions are in place. There is no UN resolution because they have a veto. Seriously, the US sanctions on Russia are FAR MORE SEVERE a response than the US abstaining as the rest of the Security Council votes for a resolution.

It is a jump in logic to think praying at the Western Wall is illegal. Though the Knesset has worked hard to make it illegal for reform or conservative rabbis to lead any prayer at the Western Wall -- much less women doing so. Not all Jews wanting to pray are male and Orthodox.

....in Crimea illegal? Or in Georgia for that matter....

Do you not believe the Western Wall is occupied territory? Along with the Jewish Quarter there? I assure you a lot of people do see it that way.

...in their historic homeland. Meaning it's not illegal at all.

Because if it isn't illegal in any other context on the planet (in another country's sovereign space) it certainly isn't illegal when Jews do it (where there has never been Palestinian sovereignty). Calling only the Jews out for illegal settling is nothing but discrimination.

Again, is the Western Wall occupied territory? Yes or No?