So unwanted was the holy land by the Jews, he further elaborated in his revolting revisionist narrative, that David Ben-Gurion resorted to forcing Middle Eastern Jews to come here. “Ben-Gurion did not want Middle Eastern Jews to come [to Israel],” Abbas told his rapt audience, “but when he saw the vast land, he was forced to bring Middle Eastern Jews… that didn’t want to come. From Yemen they flew 50,000 Jews… Then they went to Iraq, which had large reserves of Jews…”

The man whose doctoral thesis blamed Zionist agitation for the Holocaust, and disputed the number of Jewish victims, on Sunday set out a series of falsehoods obvious to the most casual student of 20th century events. He detailed a narrative that allowed no historic Jewish connection to this land — no Biblical history, no Temples, no ancient sovereignty. He airbrushed the Jewish nation out of its own past.

Obviously, no leader so determinedly blinded to his enemy’s legitimacy could ever have agreed to reconciliation. Abbas’s public excuse for rejecting Olmert’s statehood offer in 2008 may have been “He didn’t give me a map.” What plainly motivated his rejection, however, was his insistent conviction that the Jews have no right to be here whatsoever.

------------

Abbas really outed himself with that speech, it's never been clearer that the Palestinians need new leadership if they ever hope to negotiate a settlement with Israel.

Limited right of return, formal acceptance of Israel by the Arab states, IDF presence in the Jordan valley and along the border, land swaps, some kind of link between the WB and Gaza.

It's never going to happen though, the Arabs just can't accept Israel, even the writers of the Saudi plan knew that.

Last edited Wed Jan 17, 2018, 03:25 PM - Edit history (1)

First, that the nation he leads was built around these hateful ideas, so he's preaching to the choir. Second, that the haters of Israel and the Wormtongues of the Left will ignore his words and continue to give the Palestinians their full support.

I swear, Israeli hardliners live on another planet

not about Palestinians accepting Israeli settlements in their country. What do you think a non-hardline offer would look like?

what part of that do you not get?

Israel would get to keep some land that is currently in the West Bank, and the Palestinians would get an equal amount that is currently in Israel. What's wrong with that? How is that hardline? While we're at it, do you think that the Israeli desire to keep the Old City or any part of it is hardline? I'm trying to get some idea of what you would consider to be a reasonable peace deal, or at least what was unreasonable about Olmert's offer.

Hope that's not what you're implying.

Unless Jews cannot be tolerated anywhere within a future Palestinian state, why not swap land or just give Jews Palestinian citizenship & guarantee their safety there? That's more civilized than demanding all Jews GTFO of their historic homeland, right?

The only people I've encountered against Jews living in EJ & the WB are those who don't believe Jews have any valid connection to their indigenous lands.

Simple question for you, if you don't mind:

Hamas recently rejected 2 offers to disarm & end their war on the Jews in exchange for massive aid to Gaza that would help Palestinians greatly. Right or wrong move by Hamas?

Europe offer: https://bit.ly/2lDA5zz
Israel offer: https://bit.ly/2KsJiFH

Decrying isolated pockets of America under exclusive control of Mexico does not imply a Jewish ban.

Cheers!

We can agree Palestinians should have their own land, but arguing East Jerusalem & Judea (cradle of Jewish civilization) is exclusive Palestinian land? That's just ludicrous.