Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumIn Bay Area, candid Israeli historian Benny Morris sounds off on genocide and politics
Israeli historian Benny Morris doesnt write to please his audience. I dont care about hasbara, he told J., using the Hebrew word for public-relations efforts to portray Israel in a positive light to the rest of the world. People who want to defend this or that cause, they work in foreign ministries, they work in other places. I work on history.
Morris, who has written or edited a dozen books, is considered one of Israels preeminent historians. His 2008 tome 1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War earned him the National Jewish Book Award in history. Considered a revisionist, he is one of three so-called New Historians who emerged in the 1980s and became known for challenging accepted narratives about Israels founding.
In the 1980s, Morris used state archives and newly declassified materials to write The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, a seminal work that took aim at the falsehoods underlying both traditional Israeli and mainstream Arab versions of the 1948 war.
The documents he reviewed showed the 700,000 or so Arabs who had fled their homes during what they refer to as the nakba, or the catastrophe, had not done so, by and large, on orders from Palestinian or Arab leaders, or autonomously, as many Israelis were led to believe. Nor were they systematically expelled as part of a master plan, as many Palestinians were taught, he summarized in a piece for the Guardian in 2012.
https://www.jweekly.com/2020/02/24/in-bay-area-candid-israeli-historian-benny-morris-sounds-off-on-genocide-and-politics/
Israeli
(4,300 posts)......you could not have chosen a bigger joke to us on the Left of Israeli politics Mosby
..well done
And here is what we think of him :
Before going into the details of the interview, one has to mention the interviewer. He is Benny Morris, the former "new historian", who in one easy jump has turned from the idol of the left into the darling of the right, redeeming himself from the stigma of being a "post-Zionist".
It was a clever choice on Barak's part. Morris conducts the interview as a sycophantic devotee, accepting unquestioningly Barak's most hair-raising statements (such as the above) and refraining from asking any embarrassing questions, obvious as they might appear.
Morris has been accused in the past of being a "revisionist" of Zionist history, because of his book revealing how the Palestinian refugees were driven out in 1948. It is rather hilarious to perceive how, in this interview, he freely levels the accusation of "revisionism" at anyone who dares to doubt Barak's assertions.
Barak does not expose himself to the questioning of a real, investigative journalist, like Deborah Sontag of The New York Times, nor does he confront an objective eye-witness, like Robert Malley, President Clinton's assistant at Camp David. These are two of the "revisionists" who evoked the ire of the Barak-Morris team, as well as that of Clinton, who - Barak recounts - called him in Sardinia to rave at Sontag's excellent and well-researched article about Camp David. "What the hell is this?" Clinton demanded, according to Barak.
Source :http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/archives_barak/
I get that you don't like him. I wouldn't expect that you would. How is he wrong? In particular, how is he wrong that the Palestinians don't want to share Palestine with the Jews (that means allowing a Jewish majority state in some part of Palestine). They continue to demand right of return, and how is that consistent with the continuance of a Jewish majority state?
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
..met him a few times , he used to live on a kibbutz not far from mine .
I would suggest you go read up more on him
...try here for a start :
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/11/14/benny-morriss-untenable-denial-of-the-ethnic-cleansing-of-palestine/
He is wrong .wrong in his interpretation of history and wrong in his politics .
Do our Right wing want to share with the Palestinians ????
Im not interested in the " continuance of a Jewish majority state " .Im a post Zionist .Im interested in equality for all citizens , no matter their race religion culture creed gender or sexual preference .
sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)wants to wipe Israel off the map.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)Would you care to prove that to me ??
Here is my problem
..I cannot post links or info in Hebrew from Israeli Left wing sites
because this is an international forum and tho you might be able to read Hebrew the
majority im sure cannot .
I cannot post links to Haaretz , IMHO the best English newspaper we still have , because
its subscription only .
I found that link on Haaretz in Hebrew and followed it .
Never heard of Jeremy Hammond before then .
I know my own people sabbat hunter and I know who Benny Morris is and what he stands for .
sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts),
but it matters that the unilateral declaration by the Zionists on May 14, 1948, had no legitimacy
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
.honestly cant see where he wants to wipe us off the map is legitimate .
Even if he did ,does , or whatever
...who cares ?
Like I said
.never heard of him before .
Nobody is going to wipe us off the map sabbat hunter...
..have some faith .
Have you ever asked yourself why the Joint List is now the third party ?
Hope this helps :
https://www.972mag.com/joint-list-palestinian-citizens-elections/
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
.so I give you one written by one of us :
The Israeli right has no clue how to deal with the Joint Lists surge
https://www.972mag.com/joint-list-israeli-right-elections/
Much has been written on these questions, but one fact is hard to dispute: with the exception of the Yitzhak Rabin government in 1992, Palestinian parties have never been part of the governing coalition. The depth of opposition to Palestinian presence in government is illustrated by the fact that Blue and White felt compelled to announce it would not rely on the Joint List, following Netanyahus succinct and accurate slogan about Gantz not being able to form a government without Ahmad Tibi.
sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)the Joint list for the first time includes Jews in their seats in Knesset.
Arab-Israelis form about 20% of the population of Israel. If the Joint list can continue to attract Jews to vote for it (as it did this past election), there will be no choice but to include them in a government.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)Blue & White, Yisrael Beytenu leaders devise guidelines for potential government and prevent fourth election; Gantz meets with Arab lawmakers, excluding Balad faction.
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/Bknduk4rL
sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)What is Balad?
Israeli
(4,300 posts)you guys questions are getting more and more ridiculous
..
cant you Google ??
https://www.knesset.gov.il/faction/eng/FactionPage_eng.asp?PG=103
aranthus
(3,386 posts)While I disagree that the only reason they are not is racism, I don't doubt that prejudice is a part of it. So is fear. I'm sure that Bibi is going around now telling potential defectors that if they don't join him, that Arabs will be in the government. I hope Bibi is right about that, and that prospective defectors tell him to stuff it.
aranthus
(3,386 posts)He says that people have a right to self-determination (which is the right to create and maintain a state), but then immediately denys that right to the Jews of Israel.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)Ref : " He's just another lying Leftist antisemite. "
That's you guys answer to everything .
Does that include Bernie Saunders ??
I give you the founder of Meretz in responce :
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=shulamit+alloni+we+are+an+insideous+people&view=detail&mid=D028EA28F1233C55F1A9D028EA28F1233C55F1A9&FORM=VIRE
aranthus
(3,386 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 8, 2020, 03:27 PM - Edit history (1)
First, it isn't my answer to everything. Second, Bernie doesn't say the things that Hammond writes, so I don't say things like that about Bernie. The label fits Hammond for the reason I gave, which you ignored.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)when I said you guys
There is nothing radical about Bernie Sanders views on Israel, yet the American Jewish establishment seems bent on portraying the Democratic frontrunner as an anti-Semite.
aranthus
(3,386 posts)I am not about to answer for "the American Jewish establishment," whatever or whoever that is. However, he does seem a little too close to people like Linda Sarsour, Rashida Tlaib, and Ilhan Omar, whom I do consider to be antisemitic.
aranthus
(3,386 posts)The question was why is he wrong about the Palestinians not wanting to allow a Jewish majority state in any part of Palestine? It seems that your real answer is not that he's wrong, but rather that you don't care that he's right.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
..you don't seem to care that he is Right wing and that he is wrong .
My kibbutz was built upon a destroyed Palestinian village , you can still see the remains today .
Have you ever been here to see for yourself ??
For those that haven't , or cant or want to remain blind
I give you Zochrot :
https://www.zochrot.org/
aranthus
(3,386 posts)You still haven't answered the question. You stated that you aren't concerned about whether Israel remains a majority Jewish state. Therefore, you don't care about whether Morris is right about the Palestinians not wanting to allow a Jewish majority state, since you don't care if there is one or not.
Israeli
(4,300 posts)which I believe came first ???
I care that there is a State of Israel aranthus , one that is for all of its citizens equally
whether they be Jewish or not
..and that BTW includes many of our citizens today
that are neither Jews or Arabs of which we have many .
aranthus
(3,386 posts)You say that you are a post-zionist, and that you are, "not interested in the 'continuance of a Jewish majority state '" I understand that post-zionists also favor right of return (at least I think that you do). In practical terms, what is the difference between post-zionist and anti-zionist? If the post-zionists get their way, it seems that you end up with a single Palestinian majority state, and that if the anti-zionists get their way, that you end up with the same thing. What is different about the end result between the two?
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
...many times in the past .
I suggest you research my previous posts on the subject .
In the meantime I give you where the term Post Zionist came into being
and why :
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1343412021
Since I had published a book entitled Israel Without Zionists a few years earlier, I was called by the defendants as their star witness. They grilled me for many hours on the witness stand on what I meant by this title. In the end the judge asked me to define my attitude towards Zionism in simple words. On the spur of the moment I coined a new term: Post-Zionism.
Since then, the term has been expropriated as a synonym for anti-Zionism. But I used it quite literally. As I explained to the judge, my position is that Zionism was a historical movement with its glorious achievements as well as its darker side. One can admire or condemn it, but either way Zionism has come to its logical end with the creation of the State of Israel. Zionism was the scaffolding that made the building of the state possible, but once the house is built, the scaffolding becomes a hindrance and must be removed.
So the judge decided that I am not an anti-Zionist. She ordered the defendants to pay us hefty compensation, which helped us to finance our activities.
aranthus
(3,386 posts)You know your posts far better than I could, and I'm not going to waste my time searching through them for something that probably isn't there. I asked a very specific question that I don't remember you ever having answered. What is the practical difference between your version of post-zionism and anti-zionism? Your cite doesn't answer that question. It does point out one of the problems with post-zionism. Post-zionism falsely describes zionism as a movement. While there is a Zionist movement, zionism is an idea. Specifically it is the idea that there should be a Jewish majority state in all or some of ancient Israel. Now the creation of modern Israel may mean that the Zionist movement has achieved its goal, but the idea remains. So the premise of post-zionism is false.
None of which even begins to answer my question as to your position about the end result of your beliefs. Again, it appears that your end result is a Palestinian Arab majority state in Israel/West Bank/Gaza. Yes or no?
Israeli
(4,300 posts)
.mine came first tho
You may think its a false premise but to those of us that live here its anything but .
A resounding NO to your last question .
You really do not understand us at all .
Try here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Zionism
In contrast to political Zionism's goal of the Jewish state, many post-Zionists advocate the evolution of Israel into a non-ideological, secular, liberal democratic state, to be officially neither Jewish nor Arab in character.