That's exactly what a democratic country does.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-60791734#:~:text=Russian%20state-backed%20news%20channel%20RT%20has%20had%20its,and%20proper%20to%20hold%20a%20UK%20broadcast%20licence%22.

since it was wrong?

Because it was right.

The UN did not claim immunity for those people, it claimed immunity for itself. The UN was being sued, not those people. The US government can claim immunity for itself but that doesn't transfer the immunity to all the people working for the government. Get it now?

Who is suing UN? What heinous crimes did the UN commit that they would need to claim immunity for itself?

You are messing with me again, aren't you? Yawn, this schtick is getting stale.

"What heinous crimes did the UN commit that they would need to claim immunity for itself? "
It did not claim immunity for the individuals but for itself. So change your post.

Did you understand the question?

It did not affirm UN's claim of immunity. It questioned UN's need for it. Duh!

Guess what is going to happen to my post.

That's right, absolutely nothing. So quit making ridiculous demands.

The UN did not claim immunity for those individuals.

Is Britain not a democratic country? Did they not shut down a news network of a repressive regime?

I am disappointed. You could have at least attempted to muster one relevant response before jumping head first into deflection mode.

Why did they shut down RT? Did they shut down Al Jazeera also? No? Because one is a state funded news site and the other is not. A Democratic country does not shut down a independent news site just because they don't like the reporting no matter how much you want them to.

One is funded by a repressive sectarian monarchy and the other is funded by a repressive secular dictatorship.

Anything else you are unable to look up on the web?

Al Jazeera has extensive reach across the globe and is available in over 150 countries and territories in more than 430 million homes. Al Jazeera is an independent news organisation funded in part by the Qatari government.
Qutar is also a major non-NATO US ally.
Nice try.

a repressive secular dictatorship?

Or is it no you have no intention to stay on subject?

Al Jazeera is an independent news organisation funded in part by the Qatari government.
Qutar is also a major non-NATO US ally.
Is that the same thing as RT and Russia?
Did I make the differences clear enough for you to see?

I concede, your clarification is still completely irrelevant to your Post #1.

I doubt you can make it any clearer.

Even when facts are presented that contradict said propaganda. That or they are unwilling to because it is their aim in the first place to spread propaganda.

And no matter the subject, no matted how obvious it is, they just can't let go of their childish insistence on posting nonsense.

Since there is no end to their ranting, i just ignore them after a while.

Spread misinformation that can lead to bad things.

For some inexplicable reason, they believe that gratuitous claims of something being factual does not make anything factual.

Weird people, aren't they?

Watch that at times.

Seems balanced, but something is missing - the Israeli need to justify their actions because some real or imaginary Hamas or Hezbollah fighters/leaders were targeted, and the civilian casualty involved in this process can be ignored.

Al Jazeera is the only station that used the word 'genocide' to describe the Israeli action in Palestine.

Shutting down a news medium that doesn't fit your efforts to project a 'Good Guy' image isn't something a Democracy does.