Creative Speculation

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts) Wed Dec 9, 2015, 09:55 PM Dec 2015

Third Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn’t ‘Terror Couple’ Who Carried Out Attack

Third Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn’t ‘Terror Couple’ Who Carried Out Attack
December 9, 2015 12:05 pm * Countercurrent News

“It’s not him,” a third San Bernardino shooting witness proclaimed about Sayd Farook and his wife.

The so-called “terror couple” have been accused of masterminding an ISIS terror attack on a Christmas office party where Sayd worked.

Earlier this month, the attorneys for the Farook family maintained that they do not believe the suspects are the ones who carried out the attacks in question.

Several eyewitnesses and family of witnesses and victims initially said that three athletic Caucasian men had been responsible for carrying out the attacks. Police immediately banned them from speaking with the media.

Just days ago, another eye-witness in the office came forward and said that in spite of what the law enforcement and mainstream media narrative is saying, the people who carried out the attack where very athletic, large, Caucasian men, who were three – not two – in number. Farook’s wife, it should be remembered weighed approximately 90lbs.

Now, a third prominent eye-witness, Chirs Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative. He recently told reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person around 7 p.m., on the evening of the shooting, who told him that he must say that Sayd Farook was the shooter.

You read that right, he says that he was called and told to change his story and say that Farook carried out the attacks with his wife, even though that is very different than what he witnessed.

Nwadike told reporters:

“No it’s not him [Sayd]. I told them about it. He’s quiet. He doesn’t make any trouble.”

“He was just spraying bullets everywhere,” Nwadike said. But the gunman was not Sayd, or his wife.

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/12/eyewitness-to-san-bernardino-says-it-wasnt-couple/#

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Third Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn’t ‘Terror Couple’ Who Carried Out Attack (Original Post) 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 OP

So they just happened to be driving along shooting guns and throwing pipebombs out the window uppityperson Dec 2015 #1

I have no special insights about this, or even theories for that matter 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #2

it's a good forum to post it in, I was being snarky at the people in the article, not you uppityperson Dec 2015 #3

Cool. I'm a CT newbie. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #4

Many "New Democrats" seem to be about obeying and conforming to whatever they're told nationalize the fed Dec 2015 #5

Thanks for the reddit links. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #6

uppityperson

(115,902 posts)

1. So they just happened to be driving along shooting guns and throwing pipebombs out the window

Reply to 99th_Monkey (Original post)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 10:43 PM

Dec 2015

but didn't really shoot up the place he worked at that?

Police went to his house and they fled with ammo and pipe bomb in their car, shot at police because....he left the party early and he knew they'd been shot up and thought the police thought he did it? He left the party earlier to go home, pick up his wife, and drive around with guns, ammo, pipe bombs? He left the party because, oooooo, ooooo, ooooo, I know. He KNEW it was going to be shot up by 3 big caucasian dudes!!!111

An unknown person called a witness's house to tell him to change his story? And this shows it's all a conspiracy?

huh.

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

2. I have no special insights about this, or even theories for that matter

Reply to uppityperson (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 10:59 PM

Dec 2015

I only posted it here because I thought it was interesting to know there were
"other accounts" of who the shooters were, AND I suspected it would get a
HIDE in any other forum.

uppityperson

(115,902 posts)

3. it's a good forum to post it in, I was being snarky at the people in the article, not you

Reply to 99th_Monkey (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 11:05 PM

Dec 2015

sorry, didn't mean to snark at you, was trying to ask rhetorical questions at them.

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

4. Cool. I'm a CT newbie.

Reply to uppityperson (Reply #3)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 11:41 PM

Dec 2015

My ulterior motive was to post something in CT, just to see what happened, how
things go down, the lay of the land, etc..

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)

5. Many "New Democrats" seem to be about obeying and conforming to whatever they're told

Reply to 99th_Monkey (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 01:05 AM

Dec 2015

on a forum called Democratic Underground no less

It's amusing, but disturbing.

This is supposed to be the basement of the underground but there are some here that hate the fact that even a few people will start to think outside the box. And they don't hesitate to berate, ridicule, insult and mock anyone that dares to post. They'd be happier if this forum didn't exist, but then they'd have to find something else to complain about.

Anyway, I have no idea what to think yet about this latest outburst of violence but here are 200+ opinions on this new 3rd eyewitness story that you posted. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3w2byg/third_eyewitness_to_san_bernardino_shooting_says/

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/ is a great place to see the latest on a whole bunch of conspiracy theories and they don't tolerate any personal attacks, unlike many other places where people are supposed to be thinking freely. All I know is anyone that believes the mainstream media at this point hasn't learned anything in the last 50 years.

Here's the guy in the article you posted

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

6. Thanks for the reddit links.

Reply to nationalize the fed (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 01:16 AM

Dec 2015

it was interesting to check out the banter.

Reply to this discussion