Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
Related: About this forum
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Chandler - How did they deploy 100s of tons of Nanothermite? (Original Post)
wildbilln864
Jun 2016
OP
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)1. They didn't. Thermite is a red herring.
Thermite can't explain the complete destruction of the towers.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)2. bullshit! of course it can. n/t
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)3. thermite cannot act that quickly or be that explosive
and the amounts required for the observed destruction are ludicrous.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)4. wrong! on three counts!
Evidence of thermit has already been found by several scientists. And thermit was used in conjuction with other incendiaries/explosives! Are you going to try to press that ridiculous Judy Wood nonsense? 
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)5. Jonathan Cole- 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)6. great post! thank you. n/t
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)7. I know there's evidence of thermite
but you didn't rebut my points either. No, I don't believe Wood's crap.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)8. sorry but it's hard to understand where you're coming from...
what do you believe happened then & how?
Response to wildbilln864 (Reply #8)
Post removed
Logical
(22,457 posts)10. Always entertaining! nt