..they would probably want some guns, yes.

And I think we'd like it.

The majority of them were slave owners, and the second amendment was intended to assure that the southern states could put down slave revolts and arm fugitive slave posses. It's inclusion was required to get southern states onboard.

Anyone not already born and raised in this paradigm and coming to objectively know (from outside without preconceptions) the paradigm, if accepting the paradigm would needs be a socio-pycho-path.

It is immoral that we, USa, the paradigm seem to have no number, no limit, no end of tolerance, of accepting kids bleeding out in the streets of America.

This is certain as the constitution outlines how it can change. They could never have imagined that our country would grow to its size nor could they imagine the population growth. Because population was far smaller, cultural differences between the states was not nearly as dynamic as today.

The founders would probably remove more than gun rights.
Their sensibilities were informed by the culture of their time.
Freedom of speech as we know it today would certainly not exist. No.friggen way. What would George and Thomas think of onlyfans? Come on now.

(I am sex positive and support sex workers so long as they have agency over their choices and career.)