Creative Speculation
Related: About this forumBoston bombers’ uncle married daughter of top CIA official
this is significant, imo
http://www.madcowprod.com/2013/04/26/boston-bombers-uncle-married-daughter-of-top-cia-official/
Interesting detail and comments, at the link.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NoMoreWarNow
(1,259 posts)sabbat hunter
(6,893 posts)doesn't seem like a better source.
NoMoreWarNow
(1,259 posts)The link is real. I'm not sure what your problem with the story is.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)I see you've been here since 2012. There was a time when Ms. Edmonds was praised here for her courage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibel_Edmonds
I mean no snarkiness about when you registered on DU. I just thought maybe you weren't aware of her bona fides .
frogmarch
(12,226 posts)the story is also on Infowars.
Until I see it on real news sites (NBC,CBS, ABC, MSNBC, and yes, CNN), I won't take it to heart.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Do you REALLY think our MSM presstitutes would touch that story with a ten foot pole.
Christ on a pogo stick!! The disinformation crew is doing as a stellar job of scaring everyone to friggin' death away from the SUBSTANCE of that story. Wake up, folks!
frogmarch
(12,226 posts)said that the CIA may have used the Russian intelligence they'd received on the Tsarnaev brothers to try to recruit them?
truth2power
(8,219 posts)frogmarch
(12,226 posts)worked for the FBI as a translator for a mere 6 months, she sure knows a lot.
She claims to be under an official government gag order to keep her from spilling the beans to the press about sensitive classified information she claims to have been privy to. She says shell go to prison if she talks. Wheres the evidence for this? Wheres the court order telling her to keep quiet, or else?
The only thing stopping her from talking to the MSM is her demand that they air everything she says, from beginning to end.
If Sibel Edmonds has something important to say, vital information to divulge, she should just do it and knock off all the drama queen nonsense.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)If you can't analyze the argument she's making, bringing in whatever information/knowledge you have about US foreign policy, to determine whether what she's saying has merit, then there's nothing I can say that's likely to change your mind.
The substance of her story is what's important. If you don't find it credible, then you should probably direct your energy to something that you find more rewarding.
I don't do mind-melds.
frogmarch
(12,226 posts)hook, line and sinker that have no hard evidence to support them. Where's her evidence? Can you cite it?
ocpagu
(1,954 posts)Never found right?
Yet, this never stopped NBC,CBS, ABC, MSNBC, and yes, CNN, of broadcasting the lie as much as they could.
It's amazing that people haven't noticed yet that US domestic media is completely loyal and collaborative with the US foreign agenda.
Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)By ERIC LICHTBLAU
Published: May 20, 2004
WASHINGTON, May 19 - The Justice Department has taken the unusual step of retroactively classifying information it gave to Congress nearly two years ago regarding a former F.B.I. translator who charged that the bureau had missed critical terrorist warnings, officials said Wednesday.
Law enforcement officials say the secrecy surrounding the translator, Sibel Edmonds, is essential to protecting information that could reveal intelligence-gathering operations. But some members of Congress and Congressional aides said they were troubled by the move, which comes as critics have accused the Bush administration of excessive secrecy.
"What the F.B.I. is up to here is ludicrous," Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said in an interview. "To classify something that's already been out in the public domain, what do you accomplish? It does harm to transparency in government, and it looks like an attempt to cover up the F.B.I.'s problems in translating intelligence."
Ms. Edmonds testified in a closed session this year before the Sept. 11 commission, and she has made increasingly vehement charges about the F.B.I.'s intelligence failures, saying the United States had advance warnings about the attacks. Families of the Sept. 11 victims - who are suing numerous corporate and Saudi interests whom they accuse of having links to the attacks - have sought to depose her as a witness, but the Justice Department has blocked the move by saying her testimony would violate "the state secret privilege.'' Her lawyer could not be reached for comment on Wednesday
Read it all: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/20/politics/20classify.html
Some of your felloe "debunkers" were very rude and uncivil to her, and one in particular was quite nasty to here, thought the rules refrain me from naming names, or "calling out". She had her own reporter here, too. He is the one who broke the news that Ms. Edmonds was indeed posting here, and that she was going to "out" herself. I remember BOTH of their names here... do YOU?? We even had a suppoort group here for her.
Yes, Sibel Edmonds Was known as "The MOST GAGGED woman in the U.S.
Hmmm.. Who to believe?? The woman who was actually *there*, working in the "INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT", or some "debunker" who was NEVER there, and was probably never even within a few hundred to more than 1000 miles away, but thinks he knows more than the person who WAS there?? I think I'll go with the one who was actally there. No hard feelings though, ok?
Peace,
Ghost
BetsysGhost
(207 posts)State Secrets
Ghost don't let trolls get to you.