That speculation isn't very Creative since it has at least some factual basis and plausibility. Having a theory about a conspiracy isn't the same thing as having a Conspiracy Theory.

There's a reason Cheney was in charge.

When the "New Pearl Harbor" went down dim son was a frozen rabbit. He just couldn't handle that big of a lie without blurting something out.

That school deal was also one of the biggest tells. A "terror attack" and the secret service doesn't throw the prez in the limos and scram? No they stay in a public location that was published in the media beforehand. So if the "terrorists" wanted to kill the prez he would have been a sitting duck, or in this case a frozen rabbit.

... you can pretty much "conclude" anything you like. For example: The slow response of both Bush and the Secret Service proves that neither were prepared for the situation. Otherwise, they would have been prepared to have Bush quickly act "heroic" rather than like a "frozen wabbit."

Unfortunately, both conclusions are fallacious (although I would say the second one is much more plausible).

is suspicious. Yet more money was spent investigating a spotted blue dress. Believe what you will but I believe that Cheney and Saudi Arabia were complicit.

... and that Cheney is evil, if the word evil has any sensible meaning. Nearly 3000 people died on 9/11, but I hold Cheney and his neocon club responsible for far, far more deaths than that after 9/11, including so many innocent deaths in Iraq that the Bush administration wouldn't even count them. There are a lot of serious questions about 9/11 and its aftermath, but none of them involve what kind of thermite Cheney used to bring down the towers.