eom

> For asking these questions, people are mocked, ridiculed and scorned.

I've never seen that, here or elsewhere -- not for "asking these questions" -- and I defy you to provide an example. What I have seen is "truthers" using questions as a rhetorical device to promote their own "obvious answers" which they claim are "the truth," and those answers being "mocked, ridiculed and scorned" because they are so absurd and/or unsubstantiated. It is true people who persist in promoting their unsubstantiated speculations as "truth" after it's been shown that their reasons range from unconvincing to misinformed to downright laughable are likely to be ridiculed, and rightly so, but that's not what you are saying above.

The bullshit about "I'm being mocked, ridiculed and scorned for just asking questions" is just another example of the intellectual dishonesty of the "truth movement": They can't even be honest about what they do and the validity of the criticisms leveled at their implausible and unsubstantiated claims.

BTW, Martin has apparently renounced Trutherism, but the fact that she fell for it at one time implies that, like Ventura, she didn't do the journalist's due diligence of actually investigating claims made by people like David Ray Griffin and Richard Gage, to get the other side of the story before making up her mind. If that came later, then good for her, and it does prove that occasionally people do escape from the spiraling delusions that lead conspiracists farther and farther away from evidence-based reasoning.

didn't want an investigation into the most spectacular crime against the US in history? Kindly answer just one of the questions posed. TIA.

BTW: you cite an article by a one DEB RIECHMANN dated March 5, 2014 wherein Ms. Riechmann states: "She once protested with the 9/11 Truth movement, which alleges that U.S. government officials might have been complicit in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks — a theory to which Martin says she no longer subscribes."

Ms. Riechmann offers no link to support her claim. But even if it's true- that Martin "No longer subscribes" to the "theory" that US Gov officials might have been complicit in the attacks it doesn't mean she isn't skeptical of the Official Conspiracy Theory. The Ventura/Martin exchange is dated Sep 12, 2014. SO when it comes to what Abby Martin believes- you can believe Deb Riechmann, or Abby Martin. Your choice.

This was published on September 11, 2014

"Just finished three-year stint for Associated Press in Afghanistan and now cover the State Department for AP"

Because the administration couldn't do anything right?

You seem angry all the time, Feddy. Why is that?

he knew that they had already planted magical silent explosives in the WTC and had the remote controlled aircraft ready to go.

... that the Saudis had the 19 patsies ready -- go time!

If you think there were no explosions, you might want to turn up your hearing aid and listen.

Several ground level explosions recorded on the morning of 9/11, and widely reported on live news.

you know...just to be sure.
no way could they have been generators, transformers, pieces collapsing or anything like that.

Except that it makes zero sense for electrical generators in the basement to blow up,
when the impact zone of the airplanes were some 80 to 90 floors up. Try again.

pieces collapsing? LOL. where do you get this stuff ? these explosions took place well before the towers fell.