Harrit lies about finding thermite, tries to spread crackpot ideas in court. Harrit needs help finding finding reality.

Niels Holger Harrit, PhD
Vitae / Resume Summary:
Ph.D. Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, 1975, Thesis: mechanistic photochemistry
Post Doctorate, Columbia University, New York, 1977
Master of Science, Chemistry, Max-Planck-Institute for Strahlenchemi, Mulheim an der Ruhr, Germany
http://nielsharrit.org/

Too bad he can't sue you too.

Danes Claus Larsen and Steen Svanholm were present at the courtroom hearings and wrote this report:
http://911facts.dk/?page_id=7023

Concerning this interview video, Steen Svanholm wrote:

Harrit @2:21: "We got the opportunity to read, actually, the footnote in the NIST report on the twin towers -- this is a footnote which I hold in very high esteem -- I love it (Interviewer: 'Maybe you should mention it.') Yeah, I'll tell you what it is -- it is -- whoever interested, if you go into the NIST report on the twin towers to page number 82, and at the bottom you will find the footnote number 13 in which the NIST investigators, in kind of cryptic language, they admit that the 9/11 report on the twin towers does not cover the collapse. This is, in my opinion, the most important footnote since second world war, because it means that there is no technical account of the collapse of the twin towers."

Until you do, you're just another anonymous opinion on the net. Lots of those, right? Ooodles and Ooodles of them.

... as do the numerous other experts who have written technical paper about various aspects of 9/11. And furthermore, they say things that actually make sense! And yet you protect your conspiracy delusions by conjuring up the delusion that they're all in on a coverup, while promoting demonstrably crappy scientists like Harrit simply because they tell you what you want to hear. So who do you think you're kidding by asking for credentials, other than yourself?

> Remember, every day more people question the official conspiracy theory.

And yet the "truth movement" passes further into insignificance and irrelevance with every passing year. Why is that? The problem with your head count seems to be that you aren't accounting for attrition.

> And you can't stop it.

Nope, but I can certainly warn people that the "truth movement" is peddling bullshit, provide at least some of the details and point out some of the blatant dishonesty, and let people look into it further and make up their own minds. Obviously, that bugs the hell out of "truthers" who want their bullshit to go unchallenged, and that's exactly why it needs to be done. Bullshit that's ignored doesn't disappear; it procreates in dark corners. It doesn't matter how "civil" my "debating" style is; what matters is that you don't have cogent responses on the actual issues, so instead you make feeble attempts to put me on the defensive.

> By the way, who taught you that being arrogant, snarky, insulting and condescending was a good way to get people on your "side" (whatever that is)?

Most "truthers," like creationists, take pride in being incorrigible, so I don't waste time trying to cajole them into reasoned thought. Either they will eventually come to it on their own or they won't. You don't seem to understand that I couldn't care much less what they believe; I only care about the nonsense that they post on public forums with the expectation that it should go unchallenged. We're not talking about subjective political opinions; we're talking about a "movement" that is a blight on reasoned, evidence-based epistemology, hustling unsubstantiated paranoid speculations as "truth" while ignoring each and every reason for calling bullshit on it. I believe I give "truthers" all the respect they deserve.

for your consistently well-reasoned, knowledgeable, adroit, unflappable, and oh so patiently educational posts.

those who have fallen for nonsensical bullshit are applauding others who also fall for it. what a surprise.

Danes Claus Larsen and Steen Svanholm=Crackpot or liars! Both I'd say.

Don't let the anti-911truthers get to you. They will fall by the wayside eventually.

Secret Service bumping into a barrier. Where's the tape? But the Pentagon gives us one BLURRY tape on 9/11 and says STFU and some do as they are told all the while waiting for the Secret Service to cough up video of barriers getting bumped. But us "truthers" are the nuts. Where are the many video tapes of the Pentagon? Why can't we see them? The Pentagon must of have thousands of cameras on ground and cameras inside. Why can't we see those tapes?

None of these "critics" have an answer for that. They just accept that we'll never see those tapes. Nothing to hide there I'm sure. And fragile planes can NOT penetrate steel and concrete at sea level speeds. Where was ANY reconstruction done on any of the 4 planes? Flight 93 supposedly had a missile hit it, why don't they dig up the plane. It can't be too hard to do. They easily got ALL of the DNA collected. The governments story of 9/11 is in the realm of the bible. Fantasy.

... and Harrit has to pay the journalist's court costs (or rather, the suckers who contributed to his "defense fund" do).

http://universitypost.dk/article/copenhagen-911-court-case-crackpot-not-libel

How much did you contribute, nat?

Confirmed by court - Harrit's claims are crackpot claims -