Could be the start of rollbacks for same-sex marriage. This version of the Supreme Court seems all too willing to disregard precedent , albeit a recent-ish precedent.

Just a thought ...... if all qualified teachers or at least the vast majority of them just refused to work for religious "schools" then the problem might take care of itself. If you can't use any credits/grades from a school to get into any higher educational institution due to all classes being taught by unqualified priests/pastors etc. then more parents MIGHT have a second thought or three about even sending their children to one.

They just want their kids indoctrinated into white Christian nationalism.

but allowing discrimination against same sex marriage couples
misleading title

It's about the right of a religious institution to hire and fire based on its religious principles.

I would expect a court to rule that a church school can refuse to hire or discharge people in marriages inconsistent with church teachings.

Or, do you think it would be okay if a group decided to refuse to hire black people (or any racial or ethnic group) and claimed it was because of their religious views that would be okay?

I don’t.

But I do expect the RW SCotUS to side with the school.

If one did, I hesitate to speculate how SCOTUS would rule. It seems that "religious freedom" trumps everything these days.

However, there are many religious groups that find same-sex marriage inconsistent with their doctrine. I can't image any court barring the hiring and firing of people whose lives are inconsistent with those doctrines, especially teachers, clergy, etc. A closer call is employment in positions that do not teach religious doctrine.

It's a matter of balancing interests. I think SCOTUS is putting too much weight in religious freedom cases lately but the courts should tread warily in cases involving employment of persons in teaching positions.