Why the #MeToo Miss USA pageant worked so well: Claiming pageants and women's empowerment are incomp

Why the #MeToo Miss USA pageant worked so well: Claiming pageants and women's empowerment are incompatible is absurd
By S.E. Cupp


Why the #MeToo Miss USA pageant worked so well: Claiming pageants and women's empowerment are incompatible is absurd


Miss Nebraska Sarah Rose Summers, 2018 Miss USA (Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)


. . . . . .

Hours after Monday night's Miss USA pageant crowned Miss Nebraska Sarah Rose Summers the winner, USA Today posted scathing commentary from Carly Mallenbaum, who called the event "a cringeworthy contest that went, no joke, straight from a heels-and-bikini competition into a montage of contestants talking about when they've experienced assault." She continues, aghast: "Later, there was a video of contestants reciting Maya Angelou's inspirational 'Phenomenal Woman' poem, all while appearing to pose for a glossy photo shoot, barefoot in a pond." And her final death blow: "It's as if producers thought that the inclusion of questions about marches and sexual violence would translate into an empowering affair."

Actually, they thought correctly. Reciting the inspirational words of poets like Angelou, including questions about sexual violence — as well as a very powerful and moving video montage of contestants sharing their sexual harassment and assault stories — all did in fact translate into an empowering affair. It was the first time in the history of the pageant — which, let's remember, was owned by none other than Donald Trump from 1996 to 2015 — in which a question on sexual assault had its own segment.

. . . .



The problem appears to be that these women were addressing sexual harassment while in the midst of a "heels-and-bikini competition." For Mallenbaum, that is somehow incongruous. To me, that's a very dangerous assertion. The presumption that women in heels and a bikini can't also share their experiences with sexual harassment is based on one of two things: they aren't qualified to; or, they are ascribed some kind of complicity in their harassment for competing in beauty pageants, or dressing a certain way, or acting a certain way. Suggesting their message shouldn't be taken seriously in the context of a beauty contest is not only absurd, it's offensive.

This is, in fact, a perfect place to have this conversation. These are women who voluntarily participate in these competitions that they, by most accounts, find rewarding, and are then subjected to dismissive criticisms by both men and women for cheaply objectifying themselves. Tell that to last year's Miss America, Cara Mund, a graduate of Brown University. Or Diane Sawyer, a former "America's Junior Miss." Or Oprah Winfrey, 1972's Miss Black Tennessee. But more importantly, many of these women have themselves been victimized at this very pageant. A number of previous contestants have accused Trump and others of inappropriate behavior and harassment in prior years. Ignoring #metoo would have meant ignoring a big part of the pageant's own troubled past. Instead it had the contestants tackle it head on, sharing their intimate stories in powerful ways.

. . . . .

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/metoo-usa-pageant-worked-article-1.4003979