Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumEnforcing Criminal Abortion Bans Post-Roe: 'A Massive Escalation of Surveillance'
Enforcing Criminal Abortion Bans Post-Roe: A Massive Escalation of Surveillance
6/7/2022 by Carrie N. Baker
Police arrest an abortion rights activist on Monday, June 6, 2022. (Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
New York-based privacy group Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.) released a chilling report last month detailing the digital surveillance threats facing pregnant women who seek abortion information and services, and how these threats could escalate dramatically if the Supreme Court repeals abortion rights and states criminalize abortion. Police, prosecutors and private anti-abortion litigants will weaponize existing American surveillance infrastructure to target pregnant people and use their health data against them in a court of law, according to the report, titled Pregnancy Panopticon: Abortion Surveillance After Roe. This isnt speculationits already happening. The report explains how anti-abortion governments and private entities are already using cutting-edge digital technologies to surveil womens search history, location data, messages, online purchases and social media activities by using geofencing, keyword warrants, big data and more. Every aspect of pregnant peoples digital lives will be put under the microscope, examined for any hints that they sought (successfully or otherwise) to end their pregnancy, states the report.
Modern surveillance tools will help states to enforce criminal abortion bans on a scale that was technically impossible before Roe, posing an unprecedented threat to pregnant women and those helping them access care. It will be truly dystopian when police can use modern surveillance to enforce these backwards abortion bans, said Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of S.T.O.P, which litigates and advocates for privacy and fights excessive local and state-level surveillance. The Supreme Court may be turning back the clock 50 years on civil rights, but anti-abortion policing will bring us an even darker future, Cahn continued. In 1973, police couldnt use the surveillance tools that have become commonplace today. Suddenly, every phone, laptop, and smart device will become a potential policing tool, with pregnant peoples location data and search histories mined for evidence. Even when abortion bans stop at the state line, the surveillance will be national, giving anti-abortion police a way to track abortion care coast to coast. Even if the laws are the same as pre-Roe, the way theyre enforced will be starkly different.
. . . . .
Geofence warrants, for example, enable police to force reproductive healthcare providers to expand medical surveillance of pregnant women, particularly those suffering miscarriages. To do this, police will use geofence warrants, forcing Google and other companies to identify everyone who comes into a designated areasuch as an abortion clinicduring a designated time.
police-abortion-bans-roe-v-wade-surveillance
. . .
The report explains how police can use geofencing and digital keyword warrants to cast digital dragnets and identify people seeking abortion information online. They also note that electronic payment records and retail sales data are potent sources for abortion surveillance. Currently only one stateMassachusettsbans geofencing near abortion clinics. Digital keyword warrants allow police to cast digital dragnets in order to identify people seeking abortion information online. Police are already using mass extraction technology to download all data on a users phone into a searchable file.
. . . .
Abortion Seekers
Finally, the report details steps people can take to minimize their digital footprint when searching online for abortion information and healthcare, such as using a virtual private network and paying for services in cash. However, the authors note that no steps can fully protect the public from anticipated abortion surveillance. The Repro Legal Helpline provides free and confidential legal advice that can help people better understand the laws and legal risk they may face in seeking abortion information online and self-managing abortion. Contact them online or call 844-868-2812.
https://msmagazine.com/2022/06/07/police-abortion-bans-roe-v-wade-surveillance/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Enforcing Criminal Abortion Bans Post-Roe: 'A Massive Escalation of Surveillance' (Original Post)
niyad
Jun 2022
OP
Scrivener7
(52,567 posts)1. I feel like this is a place where old ladies like me can help. I can look up anything I like, and
no one can accuse me of having an abortion.
When the time comes, we can set up networks of people - men or women who are not of childbearing ages - to call who can do the research for you.
I wonder, too, what the legality would be for an old lady like me to post abortion information online.
Interesting issues. I'm bookmarking this for that phone number on the legality of the things we are going to have to do.
niyad
(119,637 posts)2. You made excellent points. As another old (not to mention, furious and outraged) lady, I will do
what I can to help.