Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumA Woman Was Ordered to Stop Breastfeeding to Accommodate the Father's Visitation Rights
A woman in Virginia has been ordered by a judge to make every effort to place the child on a feeding schedule and use a bottle in order to accommodate the babys fathers visitation rights and schedule, the Washington Post reported this week. The order, originally issued at the end of November, is set to take effect this month.
Since Arleta Ramirezs daughter was born last July, shes been breastfed, which Ramirez says is in accordance with all guidance from her doctors. But the judge ordered that her daughters father, Mike Ridgway, must be permitted to visit the baby four days per week with overnight visits. Ramirezs baby needs to be fed once an hour, and feeding time interferes with her exs visitation time, prompting the court order for Ramirez to stop breastfeeding.
This is somehow, apparently, something courts can just do.
The Post notes that because most custody disputes are handled in state courts and dont surface consistently in public records, theres little paper trail to show how common cases like Ramirezs are. And consequently, theres little data showing how frequently mothers like her may be ordered by courts to stop breastfeedingregardless of what their babies may be used to and prefer, and regardless of someones choice and preference for their body. As writer Moira Donegan notes, the court order Ramirez faces uses the law to coerce women into unchosen bodily, health, and family circumstances for the sake of mens entitlements or whims.
Stephanie Bodak Nicholson, president of La Leche Leagues USA Council, told the Washington Post that she receives at least one call each year regarding breastfeeding-related legal issues in custody disputes. A prominent mens rights legal group called The Firm for Men (incidentally, it doesnt accept women clients) states on its website that it identifies what it calls breastfeeding ploys for women seeking custody as a major concern and recurring issue.
https://jezebel.com/a-woman-was-ordered-to-stop-breastfeeding-to-accommodat-1850065735
An ex-husband behaving like a child, an attorney who seems to be part of the MRA movement, and a judge who knows absolutely nothing about breastfeeding. What could possibly go wrong here?
hlthe2b
(106,364 posts)Not to mention the damned judge.
onecaliberal
(35,835 posts)Gaugamela
(2,658 posts)judge is ordering her to provide sleepovers for her ex? Unbelievable.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,957 posts)lostnfound
(16,643 posts)8 months old is pretty young to let a baby out of sight without major trust in that person
Gaugamela
(2,658 posts)for the mother to catch up on sleep. Of course, that ignores everything else thats disturbing about this arrangement.
Timeflyer
(2,637 posts)And breastfeeding is seen as a weapon women use in their diabolical war on men? Goddess, I wish men could get pregnant!
3catwoman3
(25,448 posts)
the father, because its not. Im just clinically curious. The baby is now 6 months old. Based on all my years as a peds NP, I would think it unusual that an infant that age still needs to eat every hour.
Divorced parents far too often dont put their childrens needs first. Years ago, I got an after hours call from a non-custodial dad. It was his weekend with his child, who was asthmatic. His ex dropped the child, his nebulizer and his meds off and said, Here, you figure it out.
Way to go, mom - who are we trying to hurt here? Idiot. (The asthma mom, not the nursing mom.)
Jilly_in_VA
(10,890 posts)that I singled out "a judge who knows absolutely nothing about breastfeeding" in my comment below the link. He's the one who ordered that the baby be fed every hour. Not the mom. The judge obviously knows nothing about babies either.
3catwoman3
(25,448 posts)It didnt make sense.
patphil
(6,959 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(10,890 posts)Those guys. Look THEM up!
patphil
(6,959 posts)Suggest you define an acronym when it's this obscure.
Ironic though, men have always had the lion's share of rights...guess they want it all, and the right to decide who else has what rights.
Jilly_in_VA
(10,890 posts)is not obscure. It's been around since at least 2015 if not longer. I don't know where people have been who think all acronyms are "obscure" somehow. I've been using most of mine since the 90s when I first got online.
IMNSHO: In my (not so) humble opinion
YMMV: your mileage may vary
are the two I use most frequently
patphil
(6,959 posts)Of course, I don't do twitter, or any other similar social media.
Jilly_in_VA
(10,890 posts)It's as common as incel.