Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(119,939 posts)
Sat Feb 18, 2023, 02:31 PM Feb 2023

The Childcare Crisis Is Costing You Money


The Childcare Crisis Is Costing You Money
2/15/2023 by Michelle McCready and Wendy Chun-Hoon


Shanikia Johnson helps student Magjor Jones, 3, at Little Flowers Early Childhood and Development Center in Baltimore, Md., on Jan. 12, 2021. (Matt Roth / The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Let’s imagine, just for a moment, a childcare and early learning system that has the public investment it truly needs. Our educators would be compensated fairly, their facilities supported and families would no longer struggle to afford and find high-quality programs for their children. Everyone connected to that strong childcare system would have more freedom to contribute to an even stronger economy. In early January, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly Employment Situation Report. It found that while the nation’s unemployment rate ticked down in December 2022 and now sits at historically low levels, the labor force participation rate—or the approximate percentage of the population who works or is actively seeking work—remained stagnant and unchanged since the beginning of 2022. In fact, the U.S. labor force participation rate of 62.3 percent is well below most G20 countries.

The picture worsens for women. Their labor force participation lags that of men by more than 11 percentage points. For families, and especially mothers, available childcare can make a significant difference by increasing labor force participation, sustaining employment and achieving economic security. We read news articles almost daily about parents who want to work. They want to participate in the labor force, but cannot afford or find the childcare they need to hold down a job. Countless parents have told us how entire paychecks can be spent to meet the staggering price of childcare. Research supports what we’ve heard: In 2021, Child Care Aware of America’s (CCAoA) analyses showed that childcare prices increased by 5 percent.

. . . . .

Today, childcare is out of reach for families throughout the country. Whether it’s after-school care or full daycare for infants, childcare consumes a large share of family income among those who pay for childcare services. A new report by the Department of Labor’s Women’s Bureau estimates the price of care represents between 8 and 19.3 percent of median family income per child. In addition, CCAoA has found childcare is significantly less affordable for single-parent households and households of color. Affordability is not the only concern; even if all families could afford childcare, the number of childcare slots available in the U.S. falls short of our nation’s needs. CCAoA determined that while 12.3 million children had all parents in the workforce in 2021, there were only 8.7 million licensed childcare slots available. That’s a 3.6 million-slot gap.

With high prices and high demand, some might think childcare providers are cashing in. This, however, is not the case. High-quality childcare is labor intensive and requires significant resources, which forces programs to operate on thin margins with childcare workers typically among the nation’s lowest paid workers. While childcare providers are the “workforce behind the workforce,” the national median wage for childcare workers is now around $13 per hour and most work without employer-provided health insurance or other benefits. Historically, childcare work is—and has been—deeply undervalued. Public support for childcare is needed to truly compensate providers properly for the important work they do. Childhood educators are entrusted to prepare our children—the nation’s greatest resource—for the future. It’s time we recognize and treat early childhood educators like the professionals they are.

We must do more to increase our nation’s stagnant labor force participation rate. Childcare providers and the families who depend on them cannot continue to bear the burden of supporting our current system without additional support. Amid the pandemic, our nation made historic investments in childcare, and the recently signed government spending bill included additional money for states to fund childcare. As vitally important as these increases are, the U.S. childcare system needs to be radically transformed. Our nation must focus on creating a childcare system that is affordable, accessible and equitable in the long term.

https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/15/childcare-economy/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

progree

(11,463 posts)
1. labor force participation rate has fallen from high point of about 67.3% in 2000 to 62.4% now
Sat Feb 18, 2023, 09:30 PM
Feb 2023

Nationally, the labor force participation rate has been dwindling from a high point of about 67.3% in 2000 to 62.4% now (BLS's January report). (It was also 62.4% in March, so there hasn't been any progress in the past 10 months).

Labor force participation rate: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

Labor force in thousands: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000



The labor force = employed + officially unemployed as per the BLS's monthly Household Survey

The officially unemployed are jobless people who have looked for work in the past 4 weeks (must be more than just looking at job listings). That's why they are counted as part of the labor force: either employed or actively looking for work. BTW, the officially unemployed is not a count of people claiming unemployment insurance, it has nothing to do with that (a common myth unfortunately).

How the Government Measures Unemployment http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

# Labor Force Particpation Rate (age 16+) by gender
ALL: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300001
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300002

# Labor Force Particpation Rate (prime age 25-54) by gender
All: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062

progree

(11,463 posts)
3. You're welcome, glad you found it useful -- it helps explains a lot of why
Sat Feb 18, 2023, 11:30 PM
Feb 2023

there are so many sectors of the economy where there are severe shortages of workers -- in comparing the prime age (25 - 54 yo) links to the corresponding "all" (age 16+) -- lots of us are aging out.

Covid-related is thought to have caused about a 1.5 percentage point drop all by itself, at least per one article I remember.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»The Childcare Crisis Is C...