Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumAbortion Pill Effective for Treating Fibroids, But Anti-Abortion Politics Stymie Access
(FUCK THIS woman-hating, life-threatening BULLSHIT)
Abortion Pill Effective for Treating Fibroids, But Anti-Abortion Politics Stymie Access
7/26/2021 by Carrie N. Baker
FDA restrictions make mifepristoneone of two medications used to end early pregnancyhard to access for off-label use and drug companies have declined to develop mifepristone for other uses. As a result, this critical medicine remains hostage to anti-abortion politics, and womens health has suffered.
Mifepristone is a non-surgical alternative for treating fibroids and possibly endometriosis as well, with the potential to reduce unnecessary hysterectomies. (Public Domain)
In 2000, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved mifepristone for abortion during the first seven weeks of pregnancy, later extending allowable use to ten weeks in 2016. While widely known as an abortion pill, mifepristone is very effective for treating fibroids and may also be effective for treating endometriosis and depression. Yet the drug is not available to use for these serious conditions because the FDA tightly restricts the medication due to intense anti-abortion pressure. The politicization around mifepristone has made research on its usefulness in treating these conditions difficult to conduct, preventing its development for treatments that could significantly enhance womens health.
The FDA restricts mifepristone in a drug safety program called the Risk and Evaluation Mitigation Strategy (REMS). Despite unequivocal evidence of its safety and efficacy, the FDA REMS blocks pharmacies from distributing the medication and requires medical providers to register with the drug manufacturer and dispense the pills themselves directly to their patients in person. These restrictions have limited availability of this medication for research and off-label uses for other conditions. But that may soon change. The Biden administration recently lifted the in-person distribution requirement for the duration of the public health emergency in order to protect against the spread of COVID-19, and the FDA is now reviewing the necessity of its restrictions on mifepristone. While the focus is on the safety of using mifepristone for abortion, lifting the FDA restrictions would free up the drug for development and use in treating fibroids and possibly other conditions.
Extensive research has shown that mifepristone is an effective treatment for fibroid tumorswhich are noncancerous growths of the uterus that often appear during childbearing years. This common condition, afflicting 26 million women in the U.S., can cause heavy periods, severe pain and difficulty conceiving. Fibroids are often treated with surgery to remove the fibroids or even hysterectomiesremoval of the uterus. Approximately 600,000 hysterectomies are performed annually in the United States, which the National Womens Health Networks contends are often unnecessary and put womens health at needless risk. Some research suggests that mifepristone may also be helpful in treating endometriosis, where tissue that normally lines the inside of the uteruscalled the endometriumgrows outside the uterus. Endometriosis afflicts an estimated 10 percent of reproductive-age women. Common treatments include laparoscopic surgeryinvolving the cutting and removing endometrial tissue or destroying it with a laser beam or electric currentand hysterectomies.
. . . .
But the drug is not available for any further usesincluding for fibroidsdespite strong evidence that the medication is effective for treating this condition. The FDA REMS make the drug hard to obtain for research and drug companies have declined to develop the drug for the treatment of any other diseases. As a result, this critical medicine remains hostage to anti-abortion politics, and womens health has suffered. More than 40 years after the development of mifepristone, this medication is still not yet the moral property of women. The FDAs current reconsideration of its restrictions on mifepristone is an opportunity for the agency to finally value womens health and lives over anti-abortion politics. The FDA should not only make this important medication widely available for abortion but also open the door for research and development of mifepristone for other life- and health-saving treatments for women it might provide.
https://msmagazine.com/2021/07/26/mifepristone-abortion-pill-fibroids-endometriosis-depression-fda-rems-biden/
Historic NY
(37,776 posts)thankfully the Dr who did the surgery is also an OB-GYN. He knew she wanted a baby so he was able to get the largest one out in a second surgery. For years, she suffered with iron lost from bleeds. etc. She is expecting a very healthy baby to be delivered in a couple of weeks. At her age 42 a hysterectomy would have been the answer .