Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(117,943 posts)
Sat Jul 8, 2023, 01:44 PM Jul 2023

Remembering Catherine Kassenoff and Continuing the Fight for Fair U.S. Child Custody Outcomes

(and the PATRIARCHAL WAR ON WOMEN continues apace. It MUST end!!)

Remembering Catherine Kassenoff and Continuing the Fight for Fair U.S. Child Custody Outcomes
6/5/2023 by Amy Polacko
Why would a brilliant attorney and mother of three take her own life? Because the dysfunctional U.S. family court system took her kids and drove her—like so many others—over the edge.

“This is a story that ends with my own assisted death in Switzerland. Its lead up has been published for years on Facebook, in Ms. magazine and in other media. The New York Court system is responsible for this outcome and should be held accountable for ruining the lives of my children, me, and so many other similarly-situated protective parents (mostly mothers) who have tried to stand up against abuse but were labeled ‘liars,’ ‘mentally ill’ and then treated like criminals.”

—Catherine Kassenoff, May 27, 2023



Catherine Kassenoff said she chose assisted suicide in Switzerland rather than living with the “unbearable pain” of being unable to see her children during her divorce while terminally ill. (Courtesy of Catherine Kassenoff)

This was the message a Westchester County, N.Y., woman sent on Memorial Day Weekend to those who knew about the epic war she was fighting—to get her three daughters back in a years-long custody dispute with her husband. And, through the tears, most of us thought four things: I am devastated; sadly, I can understand how she reached this heartbreaking decision; our family court system did this; and we must fight for change before we lose more Catherines. Our courts repeatedly allow abusers to weaponize our legal system against women—making them the target of a war that can cost them, like Kassenoff, their health, jobs, money, homes, children and peace. No one should live this way in America—or anywhere. It’s an underworld only those who have been through family court, or know someone who has, can comprehend.

. . . .. . .

But if a superwoman like Catherine Kassenoff—who had grit, plus training as an elite legal mind—was defeated by our American family court system, what does that say for the rest of women terrorized and victimized? George Washington University Law professor Joan Meier, who Kassenoff refers to in her final message, conducted an illuminating 2020 study that proved when women report domestic or child abuse the tables are often turned on them and they lose custody of their children. It’s a no-win situation.

In her “U.S. child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: what do the data show?” study, Meier found:

Less than half (41 percent) of women’s abuse claims are treated seriously.
The chances that mothers’ allegations of child abuse will be believed are 2.23 times lower than domestic abuse.
Child sexual abuse is rarely accepted by the courts—at 15 percent.
Mothers reporting a father’s abuse (of various kinds) lost custody in 26 percent of cases.

So, who benefits from all of this? All the court appointed experts, therapists, parent coordinators and sometimes judges. Take it from Kassenoff, who said this after recounting how she was evicted from her home, arrested and barred from having custody of her children:

“Despite all of this, over these last 4+ years, I have kept going and fighting for my parental rights and to be a mother to my children. There are over 3,000 court filings in my case on NYSCEF [New York State Courts Electronic Filing], which I urge you to review. There are close to 80 motions. There are now 3 Attorneys for the Children and new therapists. The money being made at the expense of my family is so abhorrent that there will be nothing left at the end. I have liquidated retirement and other savings … My children have been diagnosed with various serious mental health conditions as a result of this trauma. They have been told to hate me, to call me ‘Catherine’ instead of ‘mom.’”
. . . . .





Rest in power, Catherine Kassenoff.


https://msmagazine.com/2023/06/05/catherine-kassenoff-death-child-custody-divorce-court/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remembering Catherine Kassenoff and Continuing the Fight for Fair U.S. Child Custody Outcomes (Original Post) niyad Jul 2023 OP
The treatment of women, mothers, and children under Family Law as exercised today has roots that in2herbs Jul 2023 #1
Thank you for this most illuminating post. I knew about the Malleus, but did not know about niyad Jul 2023 #2

in2herbs

(3,027 posts)
1. The treatment of women, mothers, and children under Family Law as exercised today has roots that
Sat Jul 8, 2023, 02:39 PM
Jul 2023

date back to the Inquisition Period.

Two prominent books on this subject were written. The first was about the European witchcraft trials titled “Malleus Maleficarum” (The Witches’ Hammer.) Written by two Dominican priests and published in 1484, it claimed that most witches were women because women are inferior beings and therefore predisposed to being evil. After blaming all the ills suffered by men on women, the two Dominican priests explained how to conduct a witch hunt. The second book of prominence, “Cautio Criminalis” was written in 1631 by the German Jesuit priest Father Friedrich von Spee. As minister and eyewitness to the horrors perpetrated on women and children accused of witchcraft, and as the single voice of resistance to organized religion’s participation in the witchcraft trials, Father von Spee accused the church-appointed judges of creating two guidelines that predisposed the accused to being guilty of witchcraft. He further accused the priests in the church of being “ignorant and headstrong” in their rush to judgment, as the accused had no chance of proving their innocence under these guidelines.

The first guideline exposed by Father von Spee claimed that the judiciary was to presume that every woman was a witch if she led an evil or improper life. (During the Inquisition Period it was the church who determined the moral standard on which the judiciary relied to conclude whether the woman was leading an evil or improper life.) The second guideline was created to encompass all women who did not fit into the first guideline, as it held that even if a woman led a good and proper life she could still be a witch, as witches can disguise themselves to appear virtuous.

The purpose for creating these guidelines was twofold. One purpose was to preserve the judiciary’s façade of integrity by providing the outward appearance that the accused were being indicted on some lawful basis – regardless of whether or not there was any actual evidence to support a claim of witchcraft. This guideline was necessary as it was considered a judicial disgrace if a woman, once accused, was acquitted.

The purpose for the second guideline was to accommodate the church, as the conviction of its deceased priests’ widows (now accused of witchcraft) enabled the church to regain the wealth its deceased priests had left to their wives as marital property. This guideline further served to strip the personal and political power from the women who had inherited their deceased husband’s wealth.

The quest for profit and political power was not restricted to the Catholic Church. Father von Spee also claimed that the judges and inquisitors, because they were being well paid for their work, had a financial interest in perpetuating this cycle of persecution, prosecution, torture, and murder against women and children.

IMO, no change will happen until there is a change in religion. Thanks for posting.

Namaste.





niyad

(117,943 posts)
2. Thank you for this most illuminating post. I knew about the Malleus, but did not know about
Sat Jul 8, 2023, 02:46 PM
Jul 2023

the second book you mentioned.

Would you consider cross-posting this as its own OP, for greater visibility? Thanks in advance.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Remembering Catherine Kas...