Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suegeo

(2,795 posts)
Tue Jul 30, 2024, 01:46 PM Jul 30

Project 2025 Traps Women at Home. It's not just about abortion.

https://jessica.substack.com/p/project-2025-abortion-explainer

This is a must read, in my humble opinion.

...(Project 2025) is really the confluence of multiple attacks that makes Project 2025’s regressive vision for women so clear. Girls growing up without sex education; funding for birth control rerouted to ‘marriage promotion’ programs; pharmacists refusing to dispense contraception and employers refusing to cover it; support that used to go to daycare now encouraging you to stay home. And, of course, no ability to end a pregnancy ever, for any reason.


What better way to force women out of the public sphere than ensuring that we’re forever pregnant?

Project 2025 calls for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to become the “Department for Life.” Under this new name, the government would track women’s pregnancies, including abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths; dismantle sex education; replace birth control programs with “fertility awareness” and marriage promotion programs; allow employers to refuse birth control coverage; allow healthcare providers and pharmacists to refuse to dispense medication they morally oppose; and divert child care funding into programs that push women to stay at home.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Project 2025 Traps Women at Home. It's not just about abortion. (Original Post) suegeo Jul 30 OP
Project report also says on page 1029 Arne Jul 30 #1
Senator Katie Britt (Alabama) has a creepy kitchen suegeo Jul 30 #2
High Heels Arne Jul 30 #3
Wanting to keep women out of the public sphere has been obvious all along. ariadne0614 Jul 30 #4
Return to Department of Life pg. 489 suegeo Jul 30 #5

ariadne0614

(1,831 posts)
4. Wanting to keep women out of the public sphere has been obvious all along.
Tue Jul 30, 2024, 02:06 PM
Jul 30

Hiding it behind religion and claiming it was only about protecting innocent “life” was just a gimmick. I must say, though, that Project 2025 is making it impossible to ignore any longer,

suegeo

(2,795 posts)
5. Return to Department of Life pg. 489
Tue Jul 30, 2024, 04:51 PM
Jul 30
Additionally, HHS (Department of Health and Human Services) should return to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care and by restoring its mission statement under the Strategic Plan and elsewhere to include furthering the health and well-being of all Americans “from conception to natural death.” HHS should return to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care and by restoring its mission statement under the Strategic Plan and elsewhere to include furthering the health and well-being of all Americans “from conception to natural death.”


Return to being known as Department of Life? Was it ever widely called this in the past?
Reject the notion that abortion is health care. WTF

None of the white guys at Heritage Foundation should have access to the bodies of women.

Far-right radical wingnuts.
Mostly to
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Project 2025 Traps Women ...