Feminists
Related: About this forumJay Smooth slams media sexism: Here’s what not to do when a woman is running for president
http://www.salon.com/2015/06/05/jay_smooth_explains_what_not_to_do_when_a_woman_is_running_for_president/Thus far in the 2016 presidential race, two women have officially declared their candidacy. Video blogger, writer and DJ Jay Smooth knows that many members of the media are dense, sexist turd balls. So, in an attempt to pre-empt the inevitable articles about the candidates wardrobe and hair and weight and emotional instability, Smooth created a brief, informative primer on what not to do when covering a woman running for president.
He and guests Kat Lazo, Zerlina Maxwell, Jennifer L. Pozner and Samhita Mukhopadhyay offer simple, if obvious, tips like dont hold a cable news panel featuring only men, dont talk about the candidates appearance and dont call a candidate pushy or calculating or domineering.
By focusing on personal, gendered, irrelevant details about women politicians, Pozner says, this conditions the American public to think that women are ladies first, leaders, only a distant second.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If only they did that with all the candidates. But, the reality is it feels more like a popularity contest watching people campaign for President. At this rate I expect some cable channel to have an American Idol type of show and we will just phone in our votes and eliminate candidates one at a time.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)There is definitely a pop culture element to national elections now. That seems to be true of a lot of the big industrialized countries.
Hopefully this race will focus on ideas and not fashion, though. There's a lot at stake this election.
Zamen
(116 posts)But it looks like that's where we're headed. The dumbing-down of the American political culture is a serious issue.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)are not restricted to female candidates. I know how these terms are often used, but when they fit someone like Fiorina, why not use them?
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)Discuss what happened to the companies that Fiorina ran into the ground? Why give her campaign any red meat about how sexist liberal media is?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)focusing on the issues will get more people to understand what is so bad about Republican ideology.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)fixate on small stuff. Partly because it's easier than big issues.
But, in Fiorina's case a large part of the reason for her failure at HP was her personality. And if she was as grating and domineering as rumored, that certainly affects her viability as President.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I don't want to see Fiorina get traction because the base gets pushed to defend her. We saw enough of that with Sarah Palin.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)When women are categorized that way for actions that get plaudits for leadership when men take the same actions, there may be a problem.
Novara
(6,115 posts)I wish to hell I can remember where I read this but there was a recent article that highlighted those differences by interviewing transgender people. They asked those who transitioned from male to female and vice versa. The people who transitioned from male to female were frustrated that no one in business took them seriously as women (they were listed to as males). The people who transitioned from female to male were surprised that all of a sudden they were listened to and respected, and they were no longer described as pushy or abrasive.
We already knew this shit, but having real-life examples is illuminating for those who don't necessarily believe it.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)than his sister, by somebody who didn't realize they were actually talking to the same person, post-transition.
Novara
(6,115 posts)I remember that comment about a "sister." It's the same person, idiots.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)It's the disproportionality.