Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
Related: About this forumThese men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech
Just in case you thought these assholes were just internet trolls. Nope, they are harassing women with lawsuits too.
http://news.yahoo.com/this-california-law-is-helping-men-213035804.html
Stephanie Burns came up with the idea for Chic CEO, a free online platform for female entrepreneurs, in 2008, when she was getting her MBA. Many of her friends had lost jobs in the recession and were asking her for tips on how to start their own businesses. After hosting about 15 friends at her San Diego home to exchange advice, Burns realized there was a market for offering entrepreneurial guidance to women. A year later, she launched her company.
Up until 2014, the focus of her work involved providing practical business advice to women in the form of free, easy-to-follow online materials. Every so often, Burns also organized networking events at which Chic CEO members could sip cocktails and chat about work. It was to one of these gatherings, held at an Italian restaurant last April in downtown San Diego, that two men showed up.
What happened next would be the fuel for lawsuits against her, her company, the company that her business partners husband owned and the restaurant. It would ultimately lead to the demise of Burns company, and still threatens to derail the women-in-tech events that have begun popping up in Silicon Valley.
Two men named Allan Candelore and Rich Allison, who had each prepaid a $20 registration fee on the Chic CEO website, tried to enter the restaurant. According to a legal complaint that they later filed with National Coalition for Men president Harry Crouch, Burns turned them away at the door, saying the event was only open to women. They took a photo, left the premises, then promptly initiated legal action, turning to a 1959 California law written to prevent discrimination against minorities and women.
<snip>
A variety of groups including A Voice for Men, the National Center for Men, the Mens Rights Association and the ManKind Initiative first began popping up in the 1970s as a rebuke to feminism. In the age of the Internet, their activism exists both in the online network known as the manosphere and at yearly meetings like the International Conference on Mens Issues.
<snip>
Utterly pathetic.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2267 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech (Original Post)
Starry Messenger
Sep 2015
OP
poor abused "nice guys" who aren't getting their guaranteed 'hot women" due to mean feminists
zazen
Sep 2015
#1
Ironically the same guys who complain about "gold diggers" also resent successful business women.
Starry Messenger
Sep 2015
#2
"a 1950s law" - the age of the law is irrelevant - if the law had been passed recently would
PoliticAverse
Sep 2015
#3
zazen
(2,978 posts)1. poor abused "nice guys" who aren't getting their guaranteed 'hot women" due to mean feminists
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)2. Ironically the same guys who complain about "gold diggers" also resent successful business women.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)3. "a 1950s law" - the age of the law is irrelevant - if the law had been passed recently would
that change anything about the issue?
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)4. I didn't write the headline.
At any rate, the spirit of the law is not being honored.
prayin4rain
(2,065 posts)5. Can you imagine the world if all the men-children instantly matured? n/t
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)6. Haha! We'd all get whiplash. nt.