Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LEGOs for girls! (But only if the LEGOs have breasts.) (Original Post) BlueIris Dec 2011 OP
That link is a gross misrepresentation of the group and the campaign PeaceNikki Dec 2011 #1
Ugh. redqueen Dec 2011 #2
How I wish you were here the other day, rq. PeaceNikki Dec 2011 #3
blue bitch comment seabeyond Dec 2011 #4
unreasonable alteration starspunch78 Dec 2011 #5
Welcome. BlueIris Dec 2011 #6

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
1. That link is a gross misrepresentation of the group and the campaign
Sun Dec 25, 2011, 03:27 PM
Dec 2011

I am livid about the GD thread (see my new post in this forum).

redqueen

(115,164 posts)
2. Ugh.
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 11:52 AM
Dec 2011

How disgusting. As if girls don't like regular legos.

I appreciate that it wasn't 100% (only 99% woooo!) 'girls get in your sexy boxes now!' crap, with the addition of the "she-garage" (ugh) to the salon (ugggggggh), but even that was made awful by calling it a "she-garage".

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
4. blue bitch comment
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 01:05 PM
Dec 2011

At Tue Dec 27, 2011, 09:08 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

What do you call a female Blue Dog?

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

No comments added by alerter

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 27, 2011, 09:19 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Sexist
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'm voting to hide this BASED EXCLUSIVELY ON THE FACT that DU has always had a zero tolerance level for the word "bitch." It's like the "n" word, often referred to as "the "b" word," because people have become so afraid to post it, regardless of the context. But it's obvious that the poster intended its use as a derogatory descriptor for Democratic women who are less than team players.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Tasteless, but I don't think it violates community standards.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Unnecessary reponse, insensitive to others.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.



if just one more poster didnt give a shit about sexism, blue bitch stands. too many people dont care about sexism. too many people embrace it. i have had more odd reasons to allow sexism to stand on du3. a joke about bluehealer dogs = blue bitches should be an anonymous hide.

starspunch78

(9 posts)
5. unreasonable alteration
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 02:09 PM
Dec 2011

Hello

I'm new here and saw your post. I think it's unncessary to make and market these toys for girls. It just seems like a further excuse to en-gender toys that don't need to be boxed up in specific genders. It's pretty ridiculous. Thank you for posting this link though

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»LEGOs for girls! (But on...