Health
Related: About this forum(UK) A rasher of bacon a day 'ups cancer risk'
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-47947965A rasher of bacon a day 'ups cancer risk'
9 hours ago
Even small amounts of red and processed meat - such as a rasher of bacon a day - can increase the risk of bowel cancer, according to research. The latest study led by Oxford University and funded by Cancer Research UK, adds to evidence, including from the World Health Organization, that eating red meat can be harmful.
(snip)
Researchers analysed data from almost half a million people involved in the UK Biobank study. Over the six years of their study they found 2,609 people developed bowel cancer.
They estimate:
◾Eating three rashers of bacon a day rather than just one could increase the risk of bowel cancer by 20%
◾For every 10,000 people in the study who ate 21g a day of red and processed meat, 40 were diagnosed with bowel cancer
◾The comparable figure for those who ate 76g a day, was 48
According to the NHS, 76g of cooked red meat is equivalent to about half an 8oz sirloin steak. A slice of ham or rasher of bacon is about 23g of processed meat.
(snip)
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)It says,1 thin slice. If that is accurate, this a very scary study.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)marble falls
(60,136 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)marble falls
(60,136 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,124 posts)Second, I wonder how well controlled that study is. Am I to believe that all those ate exactly the same diet except for the bacon? Well, probably not.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Little in the way of causality here
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,124 posts)People tend to totally freak out over these things, in no small part because most of them simply don't understand numbers, let alone statistics of any kind.
A couple of interesting books about cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies by Siddhartha Mukherjee, and The Cancer Chronicles by George Johnson.
The latter one is especially good as it points out that even dinosaurs got cancer. It is not a modern disease, or only from environmental triggers. Cancer rates in humans seem to have been pretty steady for thousands of years. And other than getting lucky in your genetics, pretty much the only thing you can do to minimize cancer risk is to not smoke. It helps to not spend too much time around asbestos, but not smoking is huge.
NickB79
(19,474 posts)As cancers from obesity take the place of cancers from smoking.
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/obesity-might-replace-tobacco-as-top-cause-for-cancer-yet-only-few-are-aware-of-the-link/amp
It is well-established by numerous studies that drinking alcohol, being obese, smoking, and not getting an HPV vaccination will all increase cancer risks.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,124 posts)to get cancer.
I remember my mother (who was born in 1916) once commenting on someone she knew who'd gotten cancer and died at an early age, "She was too young to get cancer," then correcting herself, because she realized while somewhat uncommon, young people could and did get cancer.
And for a very long time doctors didn't always tell their patients that they had cancer, or the family conspired not to let the person know.
TexasProgresive
(12,243 posts)They may be true or not, and along comes another study disproving a study. This has been going on for most of my 69 years. Just take coffee, it's bad, it's good, it's bad, it's good, it's bad, it's good - I forget whether it's good or bad according to the latest study.
I think the reporting of studies like this to the general public is what has given science a black eye. People think they don't know anything and I'll believe what I want such as vaccinations are bad and the earth is flat with an ice wall around the edges.
I am not saying that cured and processed meats are not dangerous in some way.