Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 09:38 PM Dec 2011

One the most informative articles I've read about 'killer' and 'benign' belly fat.

Source Discover Magazine

snip



Visceral fat lies deep inside the abdomen, surrounding vital organs like the liver, heart, intestines, and kidneys, as well as hanging, in a separate double flap, off the ends of the stomach like an apron. In lean people, the flap, known as the omentum, is thin enough to be seen through (by
someone in a position to have a look, that is). In obese people it may be inches thick, fused, and "hard like cake," according to Edward Mun, now director of bariatric surgery at Faulkner Hospital in Boston; he is the surgeon who removed part of Garofolo's omentum. Packed around the organs is another type of visceral fat, called mesenteric.

The abdominal region harbors still another kind of fat, which lies outside the abdominal wall, just under the skin. This subcutaneous, or peripheral, fat tends to be soft and flabby; you can pinch or grab it. It has two compartments, the deeper of which is thought, like visceral fat, to have negative effects on health. The superficial layer may cause cosmetic distress in women who get a buildup of it as they age, but from a medical perspective it is considered benign. Subcutaneous fat also appears outside the abdominal area, on the lower body—the hips, buttocks, and upper thighs. There it is not only benign but actually beneficial.

"Peripheral fat is, in reality, good fat," explains Osama Hamdy, director of the obesity clinic at the Joslin Diabetic Center.

Before menopause, women tend to have more good fat than men do. One interpretation holds that, through most of human evolution, visceral fat was useful for short-term storage—it accumulates quickly and is released quickly—for the benefit of male hunters who needed quick access to energy. Subcutaneous fat, in contrast, was meant for long-term energy storage, for the benefit of the (often female) gatherers who had to wait a long time between meals. Subcutaneous fat is less active metabolically than visceral fat. "It's like a big bucket," Smith says. "It locks the fat in." Put another way, it keeps accepting excess caloric energy that might otherwise end up in the abdomen. Jean-Pierre Després, director of research in cardiology at the Laval Hospital Research Center in Quebec City, calls subcutaneous fat "an expandable metabolic sink."



http://discovermagazine.com/2007/feb/visceral-fat










2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One the most informative articles I've read about 'killer' and 'benign' belly fat. (Original Post) snagglepuss Dec 2011 OP
I didn't know that about sumo wrestlers ZenLefty Dec 2011 #1
I was surprised by that too. I was also surprised to read that viseral fat is basically snagglepuss Dec 2011 #2

ZenLefty

(20,924 posts)
1. I didn't know that about sumo wrestlers
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 10:55 AM
Dec 2011

I knew they were generally healthier than overweight people who didn't exercise. Their low levels of visceral fat, probably due to regular exercise, may be an indication why. That's interesting.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
2. I was surprised by that too. I was also surprised to read that viseral fat is basically
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 05:00 PM
Dec 2011

an endocrine organ, manufacturing hormones.

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Exercise and Fitness»One the most informative ...