Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pro-Choice
Related: About this forumFederal Court Rules Anti-Abortion Group (fake PP videos) Can’t Plead the Fifth
Federal Court Rules Anti-Abortion Group Cant Plead the Fifth
A federal judge ruled last week that the anti-abortion group calling itself the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and BioMax, the two defendants in a lawsuit filed by the National Abortion Federation (NAF) in response to the release of several fraudulent sting videos, cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment in order to avoid NAFs requests for discovery.
In a defeat for CMP and Biomax, Judge William Orrick of the U.S. District Court of Northern California in San Francisco, ordered that both organizations must comply with the courts requests for documents and other potential pieces of evidence. No U.S. court has allowed a corporation to plead the Fifth Amendment, a protection against self-incrimination.
Its telling that the defendants have been very vocal in the media saying that they have nothing to hide, yet in federal court they want to plead the Fifth, said NAF President Vicki Saporta. We are pleased with the results of todays hearing and are eager to move forward with the discovery process.
Both CMP founder, David Daleiden, and Troy Newman, head of Operation Rescue and one of CMPs founding officers, had previously indicated that they intend to plead the Fifth, as individual defendants. The Court rejected their argument that they should be able to use a blanket Fifth Amendment protection against all questions posed by NAF, but that they could assert Fifth Amendment rights on a question-by-question basis. Judge Orrick made clear, however, that plaintiffs could challenge the assertion of the Fifth Amendment and that the Court would rule on a question-by-question basis whether Fifth Amendment protections applied.
In July, NAF filed a lawsuit against extremist organization CMP and Biomax alleging civil conspiracy, racketeering, fraud and breach of contract, following the wide distribution of falsified videos suggesting NAF members, including Planned Parenthood, illegally sold fetal tissue. There is no evidence that Planned Parenthood has ever sold fetal tissue. Planned Parenthood clinics in two states (making up only one percent of Planned Parenthood health centers in the country) allow patients to participate in legal fetal tissue donation programs. The decision by Judge Orrick marks another victory for NAF and Planned Parenthood as anti-abortion extremists continue to blur the lines of fact and fiction. Last month, the court granted NAF a temporary restraining order against CMP, Biomax, Daleiden, and Newman.
http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/09/21/federal-court-rules-anti-abortion-group-cant-plead-the-fifth/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1514 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Court Rules Anti-Abortion Group (fake PP videos) Can’t Plead the Fifth (Original Post)
niyad
Sep 2015
OP
Gothmog
(154,421 posts)1. A non-natural person can not plead the 5th
niyad
(119,875 posts)2. but, according to the supremes, corporations are people.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)3. if charges can be instituted against objects,
Last edited Tue Sep 22, 2015, 12:04 PM - Edit history (1)
are objects entitled to 5th amendment protections?