Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue May 8, 2018, 04:49 AM May 2018

Newest attack on Roe v. Wade shows abortion opponents are done being subtle

Last Friday, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) gave both middle fingers to the Supreme Court of the United States.

A new law, signed by Reynolds, effectively bans abortions around the sixth week of pregnancy — before many people are even aware that they are pregnant. It’s a cartoonish attack on the right to choose, the kind of legislation by blunderbuss that rarely ends well for policymakers.


As recently as 2016, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that states may not enact a law restricting abortion “if the ‘purpose or effect’ of the provision ‘is to place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability.” Iowa’s six-week abortion ban takes effect long before a fetus becomes viable (even especially optimistic studies indicate that a fetus is unlikely to survive outside of the womb without 22 weeks of gestation). And Iowa’s new law does not simply “place a substantial obstacle” before patients seeking an abortion — it forbids abortion outright for most patients with pre-viable pregnancies.

Iowa’s new law closely maps a similar ban enacted by North Dakota in 2013. Notably, that law was struck down by a panel of three Republican appointees to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit — the same circuit that oversees Iowa — so the Iowa’s new ban should have no legal legs to stand on when it arrives in court.

more
https://thinkprogress.org/the-anti-abortion-movements-latest-attack-on-roe-v-wade-is-less-subtle-than-a-trainwreck-6a4e8b86799c/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newest attack on Roe v. Wade shows abortion opponents are done being subtle (Original Post) n2doc May 2018 OP
And in the meantime, how many women needing abortions Ilsa May 2018 #1
How long before they ban robbob May 2018 #2
SUBTLE?! PJMcK May 2018 #3

Ilsa

(62,231 posts)
1. And in the meantime, how many women needing abortions
Tue May 8, 2018, 04:57 AM
May 2018

Will have to travel out of state to get one? Screw them.

robbob

(3,636 posts)
2. How long before they ban
Tue May 8, 2018, 05:25 AM
May 2018

out of state travel for the purpose of getting an abortion. And charging women who travel to another state to get an abortion with first degree murder?

Handmaidens tale here we come...

PJMcK

(22,883 posts)
3. SUBTLE?!
Tue May 8, 2018, 05:53 AM
May 2018

By subtle, do you mean killing doctors who perform abortions?

By subtle, do you mean bombing women's health clinics?

By subtle, do you mean screaming insults at women who need health care?

I could go on but there has been nothing subtle about the actions of the so-called pro-life movement. They are criminals who violate the civil rights of Americans.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»Newest attack on Roe v. W...