American History
Related: About this forum"The North can't afford to have the mouth of the Mississippi in a foreign country."
A white male Southern character in a fiction novel said that right before the beginning of the Civil War.
ELI5, please: why would that be?
AleksS
(1,701 posts)Shipping things on the Mississippi was a big deal. Having access controlled by another country (the CSA) would be a major burden.
Especially since the North relied on industry and being able to bring in raw materials, unrestricted access to that major shipping lane was vital.
CanonRay
(14,915 posts)Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Missouri went out this way.
Sneederbunk
(15,329 posts)the capture of New Orleans (South's largest city) early in the war.
Mary in S. Carolina
(1,364 posts)need the mouth of the Mississippi; we have the Great Lakes. Just dam up the river or flood out the southern states. I am not advocating this. I think the Red River of the North is the only river that flows north, so just stop the flow of all rivers south...that would be a huge problem for the South.