The Lincoln-Douglas debates weren’t as great as Gingrich thinks
By Harold Holzer, Published: January 27
Harold Holzers many books on Lincoln and the Civil War include The Lincoln-Douglas Debates: The First Complete, Unexpurgated Text.
For months, Newt Gingrich has floated the same challenge to President Obama that underdogs have hurled at their political rivals for more than a century: Lets debate. And not just once or twice, but many times, with no moderators to intervene or inhibit us. Just two candidates, head to head Lincoln-Douglas style.
As a Lincoln historian, Ive studied the famous meetings between challenger Abraham Lincoln and incumbent Stephen A. Douglas that set the prairies on fire during the 1858 U.S. Senate race in Illinois. Gingrich has even called me to discuss them. As Ive told Gingrich, the problem is that, as famous as the debates are, their reputation far outweighs their value. And theyre hardly an inspiring model for modern candidates seeking to showcase their oratorical skills.
More:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-lincoln-douglas-debates-werent-as-great-as-gingrich-thinks/2012/01/25/gIQABwX1VQ_story.html