Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

American History

mahatmakanejeeves

(59,613 posts) Wed Jul 10, 2024, 06:37 AM Jul 10

On this day, July 10, 1913, the air temperature in Furnace Creek, California, reached 134 degrees F.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page, On this day

• 1913 – The air temperature in Furnace Creek, California, reached 134 °F (56.7 °C), recognized by the World Meteorological Organization as the highest recorded on Earth.

Mon Jul 10, 2023: On this day, July 10, 1913, the air temperature in Furnace Creek, California, reached 134 degrees F.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

On this day, July 10, 1913, the air temperature in Furnace Creek, California, reached 134 degrees F. (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jul 10 OP

The name of the town kinda gives it away. zanana1 Jul 10 #1

I've been through there twice Vogon_Glory Jul 10 #2

zanana1

(6,244 posts)

1. The name of the town kinda gives it away.

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed Jul 10, 2024, 09:39 AM

Jul 10

Vogon_Glory

(9,352 posts)

2. I've been through there twice

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed Jul 10, 2024, 11:22 AM

Jul 10

Both times were in very early June. I believe that the temperature was merely in the hundred teens. My memory is hazy, but I like to think that I brought a couple of gallon jugs of water in case of an emergency.

The second time I went there was to photograph the former Death Valley Railroad steam locomotive preserved there. Unfortunately for me the view was obstructed and in view of how many old photos are now on the Net, I have no particular desire to go back.

Reply to this discussion