Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gredinger

(86 posts)
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:00 PM Feb 2020

Intellectual Property Reform.

I wasn't quite sure where to post this... but a thought occurred to me regarding intellectual property; Bambi.

Bambi was released in 1942, you know, during WW2. The original authors and animators are probably either near end of life or dead. Why is it that this film still cost $15? Why can't I share this work with friends or family?

Normally, works only last the author's lifetime. The constitution says intellectual property will be protected for a "limited" time. Why is the limited time more than a lifetime?

I'm pretty sure the reason is Disney fighting for more restrictive intellectual property rights and continuous expansion of these "rights". They've done so by buying politicians to do so. When will politicians say "enough is enough" and reform intellectual property?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Intellectual Property Reform. (Original Post) gredinger Feb 2020 OP
... handmade34 Feb 2020 #1
Wow... gredinger Feb 2020 #2
yup handmade34 Feb 2020 #3
It's also insanely important to small, individual creators. progressoid Feb 2020 #9
It was even nicknamed the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act" JHB Feb 2020 #11
I agree that intellectual property rights are manipulated. defacto7 Feb 2020 #4
Right to Repair gredinger Feb 2020 #6
Right to Repair. I'll have to look it up. defacto7 Feb 2020 #7
Right to Repair gredinger Feb 2020 #8
Agree, agree, agree... defacto7 Feb 2020 #10
If you have a copy, I think you can SHARE it with family and friends. But, if caught, you can't SELL Hoyt Feb 2020 #5

handmade34

(22,923 posts)
1. ...
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:06 PM
Feb 2020
Works in Existence but Not Published or Copyrighted on January 1, 1978 The law automatically gives federal copyright protection to works that were created but neither published nor registered before January 1, 1978. The duration of copyright in these works is generally computed the same way as for works created on or after January 1, 1978: life plus 70 years or 95 or 120 years, depending on the nature of authorship. However, all works in this category are guaranteed at least 25 years of statutory protection. The law specifies that in no case would copyright in a work in this category have expired before December 31, 2002. In addition, if a work in this category was published before that date, the term extends another 45 years, through the end of 2047.
 

gredinger

(86 posts)
2. Wow...
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:08 PM
Feb 2020

> life plus 70 years or 95 or 120 years (+45 years)

Seems like an insanely long time. We need to reduce this time. I'm willing to bet Disney helped draft that law.

progressoid

(50,746 posts)
9. It's also insanely important to small, individual creators.
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:36 PM
Feb 2020

If I write a successful book or a popular song etc, with this law I can count on it to benefit my children when I die rather than a corporation snatching it up and cashing in on it.

JHB

(37,414 posts)
11. It was even nicknamed the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act"
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 01:13 PM
Feb 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act

This law, also known as the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, Sonny Bono Act, or (derisively) the Mickey Mouse Protection Act,[4] effectively "froze" the advancement date of the public domain in the United States for works covered by the older fixed term copyright rules. Under this Act, works made in 1923 or afterwards that were still protected by copyright in 1998 would not enter the public domain until January 1, 2019 or later. Mickey Mouse specifically, having first appeared in 1928, will be in a public domain work in 2024[5] or afterward (depending on the date of the product). Unlike copyright extension legislation in the European Union, the Sonny Bono Act did not revive copyrights that had already expired. The Act did extend the terms of protection set for works that were already copyrighted, and is retroactive in that sense. However, works created before January 1, 1978, but not published or registered for copyright until recently, are addressed in a special section (17 U.S.C. § 303) and may remain protected until the end of 2047. The Act became Pub.L. 105–298 on October 27, 1998.


defacto7

(13,610 posts)
4. I agree that intellectual property rights are manipulated.
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:11 PM
Feb 2020

though I also think those rights are important to a degree. Do you think Sanders would be capable of instigating and accomplishing the changes necessary to correct political payola that affects this and other rights issues. I'm not convinced. Lots of good intentions but the road you know...

 

gredinger

(86 posts)
6. Right to Repair
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:16 PM
Feb 2020

As part of Bernie's campaign platform, he mentions protecting the "right-to-repair". This is a form of intellectual property.

Honestly, universal single payer healthcare would benefit from some intellectual property reform in regards to pharmaceuticals.

defacto7

(13,610 posts)
7. Right to Repair. I'll have to look it up.
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:25 PM
Feb 2020

Hell yeah, reform in regard to pharma is huge. Who can deliver is the question. Warren and Sanders seem the most verbal on this. Not my choices today but with regard to this op they seem prominent.

 

gredinger

(86 posts)
8. Right to Repair
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:27 PM
Feb 2020
https://www.wired.com/story/john-deere-farmers-right-to-repair/

This was the story that convinced me. There were several court cases about jailbreaking iPhones back in the day too which is where I took my original stance of "where if you own it, its yours regardless of software locks".

We're starting to see software locks becoming more and more common. If it starts to become illegal to pick your own locks, we're going down a dangerous path.

defacto7

(13,610 posts)
10. Agree, agree, agree...
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:43 PM
Feb 2020

You buy it, you own it, all of it. I spent a lot of time 5 to 20 years ago slipping around ms claims to software and hardware for clients who bought them outright yet were unable to manouver their personal property or hardware due to the finger of ms. In the end I just tried to convince them to wean themselves off of closed source. The ones that did were happier but most were pigeonholed. Times have changed in some ways though and locking owned products is fascist in my opinion.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. If you have a copy, I think you can SHARE it with family and friends. But, if caught, you can't SELL
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 12:11 PM
Feb 2020

it to people, charge to view, etc., without paying some royalties. Not an attorney or expert on patents or copyrights.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Intellectual Property Ref...