Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumBowser Had 'Black Lives Matter' Painted On A D.C. Street. Other Groups Say They Should Get A Turn
"Congress shall make no law."
Hat tip, Greater Greater Washington
Breakfast links: Should public expression on streets be allowed for all groups?
By Latisha Johnson (Contributor) August 6, 2020
By Latisha Johnson (Contributor) August 6, 2020
AUG 5, 4:34 PM
Bowser Had Black Lives Matter Painted On A D.C. Street. Now Other Groups Say They Should Get A Turn
Martin Austermuhle
A mural that says Baby Lives Matter outside a D.C. Planned Parenthood.
Courtesy of Karen Ramsey
Its a fight over D.C.s streets, literally.
In the wake of Mayor Muriel Bowsers attention-grabbing painting of the words Black Lives Matter along a two-block stretch of 16th Street NW in early June, a pair of conservative groups is now waging a fight to gain the same right to have their messages displayed on city asphalt.
And the fight is not limited to D.C.: a similar street mural in Tulsa could soon be removed after a pro-police group sought to paint its own message on another street, while Back the Blue was painted on a street in front of Tampas police department over the weekend.
The fight started last month, when conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch sued D.C. over claims that it hasnt been given the chance to paint its slogan Because No One Is Above the Law! on a city street. The group says that the citys failure to let it request a permit is a violation of the First Amendment.
In July, an anti-abortion activist painted Baby Lives Matter on the street in front of a Planned Parenthood Clinic on Fourth Street NE. (A similar street mural was painted in Salt Lake City in mid-July, and the artist is raising money to paint murals in other cities.) And last weekend, two anti-abortion activists were arrested after attempting to write Black Pre-Born Lives Matter in chalk on the sidewalk in front of the same clinic.
That group, Students for Life of America, now says it plans on suing D.C. over the arrests. Kristan Hawkins, the groups president, says that if Black Lives Matter can remain painted on a city street, other messages must also be allowed on them.
Shes opened up the streets for public expression from any group, says Hawkins, referring to Bowser. The mayor doesnt get to choose what speech is allowed on streets and whats not.
{snip}
Bowser Had Black Lives Matter Painted On A D.C. Street. Now Other Groups Say They Should Get A Turn
Martin Austermuhle
A mural that says Baby Lives Matter outside a D.C. Planned Parenthood.
Courtesy of Karen Ramsey
Its a fight over D.C.s streets, literally.
In the wake of Mayor Muriel Bowsers attention-grabbing painting of the words Black Lives Matter along a two-block stretch of 16th Street NW in early June, a pair of conservative groups is now waging a fight to gain the same right to have their messages displayed on city asphalt.
And the fight is not limited to D.C.: a similar street mural in Tulsa could soon be removed after a pro-police group sought to paint its own message on another street, while Back the Blue was painted on a street in front of Tampas police department over the weekend.
The fight started last month, when conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch sued D.C. over claims that it hasnt been given the chance to paint its slogan Because No One Is Above the Law! on a city street. The group says that the citys failure to let it request a permit is a violation of the First Amendment.
In July, an anti-abortion activist painted Baby Lives Matter on the street in front of a Planned Parenthood Clinic on Fourth Street NE. (A similar street mural was painted in Salt Lake City in mid-July, and the artist is raising money to paint murals in other cities.) And last weekend, two anti-abortion activists were arrested after attempting to write Black Pre-Born Lives Matter in chalk on the sidewalk in front of the same clinic.
That group, Students for Life of America, now says it plans on suing D.C. over the arrests. Kristan Hawkins, the groups president, says that if Black Lives Matter can remain painted on a city street, other messages must also be allowed on them.
Shes opened up the streets for public expression from any group, says Hawkins, referring to Bowser. The mayor doesnt get to choose what speech is allowed on streets and whats not.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1607 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bowser Had 'Black Lives Matter' Painted On A D.C. Street. Other Groups Say They Should Get A Turn (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2020
OP
Unborn baby's lives are not born yet. Their lives are not yet separate from their mother's so this
The Wielding Truth
Aug 2020
#2
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)1. I can definitely see both sides to this particular argument (nt)
The Wielding Truth
(11,421 posts)2. Unborn baby's lives are not born yet. Their lives are not yet separate from their mother's so this
is really mute. I'm not saying that I don't support any pregnancy that is desired and wanted and accepted by the mother or the mother determines the responsibility for that independent life to be.
MichMan
(13,160 posts)3. They aren't wrong
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)4. The streets are paid for by taxpayers so the taxpayers own them. Religious symbols abound
but some Christians put the Satanists down. Who gets the right to self-expression? I'm fine with BLM but having a swastika painted on the street would certainly raise my ire. Let's go and find out just
what the will of the people is...